Polk v. Cavin et al

Filing 222

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF OCTOBER 15, 2012 ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 26, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

SUSAN MAE POLK,
Plaintiff,

9
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11
12

No. C 08-1483 MMC (PR)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST TO FILE MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION OF OCTOBER 15,
2012 ORDER

v.
DEPUTY JAMES CAVIN, et al.,
Defendants.
/

13
14

Before the Court is plaintiff’s “Request to File Motion for Reconsideration of Court’s

15

10/15/12 Order Denying Plaintiff’s Objections to Magistrate’s 9/13/12 Orders; Request for

16

Extension of Time to File Motion for Reconsideration; Motion to Stay Process,” filed

17

November 14, 2012. Having read and considered the request, the Court rules as follows:

18

To the extent the request seeks leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the

19

Court’s October 15, 2012 order, the request is hereby DENIED, for the reason that plaintiff

20

fails to identify a cognizable basis for reconsideration. See Civil L.R. 7-9(b) (setting forth

21

circumstances wherein reconsideration may be appropriate).

22

In light of said denial, to the extent the request seeks an extension of time to file the

23

above-referenced proposed motion for reconsideration and seeks a stay of all proceedings

24

while the motion for reconsideration is pending, the request is DENIED as moot.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: November 26, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge