Polk v. Cavin et al

Filing 222

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF OCTOBER 15, 2012 ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 26, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 SUSAN MAE POLK, Plaintiff, 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 No. C 08-1483 MMC (PR) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF OCTOBER 15, 2012 ORDER v. DEPUTY JAMES CAVIN, et al., Defendants. / 13 14 Before the Court is plaintiff’s “Request to File Motion for Reconsideration of Court’s 15 10/15/12 Order Denying Plaintiff’s Objections to Magistrate’s 9/13/12 Orders; Request for 16 Extension of Time to File Motion for Reconsideration; Motion to Stay Process,” filed 17 November 14, 2012. Having read and considered the request, the Court rules as follows: 18 To the extent the request seeks leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the 19 Court’s October 15, 2012 order, the request is hereby DENIED, for the reason that plaintiff 20 fails to identify a cognizable basis for reconsideration. See Civil L.R. 7-9(b) (setting forth 21 circumstances wherein reconsideration may be appropriate). 22 In light of said denial, to the extent the request seeks an extension of time to file the 23 above-referenced proposed motion for reconsideration and seeks a stay of all proceedings 24 while the motion for reconsideration is pending, the request is DENIED as moot. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: November 26, 2012 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?