Polk v. Cavin et al
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF OCTOBER 15, 2012 ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 26, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2012)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SUSAN MAE POLK,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 08-1483 MMC (PR)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST TO FILE MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION OF OCTOBER 15,
DEPUTY JAMES CAVIN, et al.,
Before the Court is plaintiff’s “Request to File Motion for Reconsideration of Court’s
10/15/12 Order Denying Plaintiff’s Objections to Magistrate’s 9/13/12 Orders; Request for
Extension of Time to File Motion for Reconsideration; Motion to Stay Process,” filed
November 14, 2012. Having read and considered the request, the Court rules as follows:
To the extent the request seeks leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the
Court’s October 15, 2012 order, the request is hereby DENIED, for the reason that plaintiff
fails to identify a cognizable basis for reconsideration. See Civil L.R. 7-9(b) (setting forth
circumstances wherein reconsideration may be appropriate).
In light of said denial, to the extent the request seeks an extension of time to file the
above-referenced proposed motion for reconsideration and seeks a stay of all proceedings
while the motion for reconsideration is pending, the request is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 26, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?