Polk v. Cavin et al
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO EXTEND FUTURE DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 26, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2012)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
SUSAN MAE POLK,
No. C 08-1483 MMC (PR)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST TO EXTEND FUTURE
DEPUTY JAMES CAVIN, et al.,
Before the Court is plaintiff Susan Mae Polk’s “Request for Order to Extend Future
Deadlines for Plaintiff’s Reply to Opposition Briefs,” dated November 12, 2012 and filed
November 19, 2012. In said request, plaintiff seeks a six-week extension of the December
6, 2012 deadline to file opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment, in light of
plaintiff’s having recently been transferred to a prison in Corona, California. Having read
and considered plaintiff’s motion, the Court rules as follows.
On October 17, 2012, plaintiff filed a request for an extension of time, asserting she
needed additional time to file her opposition in light of her recent transfer to the Corona
facility. By order filed November 6, 2012, the Court denied plaintiff’s request. In said order,
the Court noted that, under the present schedule and as a result of numerous extensions
plaintiff has been afforded, plaintiff will have close to one year to prepare her opposition,
and, further, that plaintiff failed to show why she could not complete her opposition by the
It appears plaintiff had not received the Court’s order of November 6, 2012 by the
date on which she mailed the instant request. In any event, plaintiff, in her most recent
request for an extension, again fails to show that, as a result of her recent transfer or
otherwise, she cannot in the exercise of reasonable diligence complete her opposition by
December 6, 2012.
Accordingly, plaintiff’s request is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 26, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?