Polk v. Cavin et al
Filing
259
ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY; DENYING REQUEST FOR SERVICE OF SUBPOENA. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 27, 2013. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/27/2013: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
JAMES CAVIN, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
_______________________________ )
SUSAN MAE POLK,
No. C 08-1483 MMC (PR)
ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY;
DENYING REQUEST FOR SERVICE
OF SUBPOENA
16
On March 17, 2008, plaintiff, a California prisoner then incarcerated at the Central
17
California Women’s Facility in Chowchilla, California (“CCWF”), and proceeding pro se,
18
filed the above-titled civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 Now before the Court is
19
plaintiff’s request to have the United States Marshal serve a subpoena duces tecum on the
20
Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Office. For the reasons set forth in the Court’s order of
21
February 19, 2013, discovery is hereby STAYED. Accordingly, plaintiff’s request for
22
service of said subpoena is hereby DENIED without prejudice to refiling once the Court has
23
ruled on defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: March 27, 2013
_________________________
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
26
27
28
1
Plaintiff currently is incarcerated at the California Institution for Women (“CIW”).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?