In re Charles Schwab Corp. Securities Litigation

Filing 403

AMENDED ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 12, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California IN RE: CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION. This Document Relates To All Cases. / No. C 08-01510 WHA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AMENDED ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL A February 10 order (Dkt. No. 370) granted plaintiffs' administrative motions to unseal portions of their submissions in support of their motion to amend the case schedule (Dkt. No. 299), motion to compel production (Dkt. No. 354) and reply in support of motion to compel (Dkt. No. 365). Information in these submissions had been designated as "confidential" by defendants. At the hearing on February 11, defendants stated while they did not object to unsealing most of these documents, they did object to unsealing exhibit I to the declaration to Steve W. Berman in support of plaintiffs' motion to amend the case schedule, on the grounds that it contains confidential employee information. For good cause shown, the February 10 order is hereby AMENDED. Exhibit I to the declaration of Steve W. Berman (Dkt. No. 296) shall be sealed. The 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 other documents unsealed by the February 10 order shall be made part of the public record and plaintiffs shall file those documents without redactions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 12, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?