Labins v. The Charles Schwab Corporation et al

Filing 519

FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR ORAL ARGUMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 24, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN RE: CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION. This Document Relates To All Cases. / Please be prepared on the following additional questions at oral argument: 7. 8. Does 17200 require a "practice," i.e., is a single failure to hold a vote sufficient? Plaintiffs claim that the disclosures held out the fund as akin to a money market fund but with a greater yield, i.e., almost no risk of losing principal. Some or all of the disclosures, however, stated that the fund would invest in MBS. Isn't there a jury question whether the MBS disclosure was adequate in light of the main theme of akin to a money market fund? 9. The bench set of disclosures should also tab and highlight with a different color from the MBS ones all passages said by plaintiffs to be misleading in the stack of key documents. No. C 08-01510 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR ORAL ARGUMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Dated: March 24, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10. If some of these questions are outside the pending briefing, please say so. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?