Labins v. The Charles Schwab Corporation et al

Filing 560

QUESTIONS ON PENDING MOTIONS. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 5, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN RE: CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION. This Document Relates To All Cases. No. C 08-01510 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 QUESTIONS ON PENDING MOTIONS / By 5 P.M. TODAY, each party is requested to answer the following questions in three double-spaced pages or less: 1. Was the fund represented in the registration statement to be diversified at all times during the various class periods? 2. With respect to the September 2006 SAI regarding uninsured mortgage-backed securities, would reasonable investors have understood it to mean, in light of the total mix of representations made, that the fund was free to invest all of the fund in uninsured mortgage-backed securities even if the underlying and ultimate source of payment was a single industry? 3. Did any other part of the registration statement (or other marketing materials) cross-reference to the uninsured mortgage-backed securities definition? Dated: April 5, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?