Vela v. AT&T Inc. et al

Filing 65

ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued to August 28, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 6, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Lee S. Harris (SBN 76699) lharris@g3mh.com GOLDSTEIN, GELLMAN, MELBOSTAD, GIBSON & HARRIS, LLP 1388 Sutter Street, Suite 1000 San Francisco, CA 94109-5494 415/673-5600 FAX:415/673-5606 Attorney for Plaintiff LOUIS J. VELA Michele Ballard Miller (SBN104198) Mbm@millerlawgroup.com Katherine L. Kettler (SBN 231586) klk@millerlawgroup.com Jennifer A. Shy (SBN 131074) jas@millerlawgroup.com MILLER LAW GROUP A Professional Corporation 111 Sutter Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94111 415/464-4300 FAX 415/464-4336 Attorneys for Defendant AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LOUIS J. VELA, PLAINTIFF, v. AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1, DEFENDANT. Case No. CV-08-1575 MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE The Court having considered the Stipulation to Continue to the Case Management Conference filed herein, and good cause appearing, PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that: 1. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for July 17, 2009 will now be heard on August 28, 2009 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7. 1. 41158B:6680-00 [Proposed] Order C-08-1575 MMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Not less than seven days before the conference, counsel shall file a joint case management statement addressing each agenda item in accordance with the Case Management Order. 6 Dated: July 2, 2009 _____ ____ HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY 2. 41158B:6680-00 [Proposed] Order C-08-1575 MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?