Haggarty v. Stryker Orthopaedics et al

Filing 50

ORDER GRANTING 49 Stipulation selecting Mediation. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/23/08. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2008)

Case 3:08-cv-01609-JSW

Document 49

Filed 12/22/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

F R A N K M. PITRE (#100077) f p itr e @ c p m le g a l.c o m LAURA SCHLICHTMANN (#169699) [e-mail] ARA JABAGCHOURIAN (#205777) a ja b a g c h o u r ia n @ c p m le g a l.c o m COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY S a n Francisco Airport Office Center 8 4 0 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 B u rlin g a m e , CA 94010 T e le p h o n e : [phone] F a c sim ile : [phone] G E O R G E COREY (#34580) [e-mail] D A R IO de GHETALDI (#126782) [e-mail] C O R E Y , LUZAICH, PLISKA, de GHETALDI & NASTARI, LLP 7 0 0 El Camino Real, P.O. Box 669 M illb ra e , CA 94030 T e le p h o n e [phone] A tto r n e ys for Plaintiff and the Class

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT N O R T H E R N DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CLAIRE C. HAGGARTY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS (aka STRYKER ORTHOPEDICS; aka STRYKER ORTHOPEDICS, INC.); HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION; STRYKER CORPORATION; and STRYKER SALES CORPORATION, Defendants.

C a s e No. CV-08-01609 JSW S T IP U L A T I O N AND [PROPOSED] O R D E R SELECTING ADR PROCESS

v
L A W O F F IC E S

28

CO TCH ETT, P IT R E & M CCARTH Y S T I P U L A T I O N AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS, Case No. CV-08-01609 JSW

Case 3:08-cv-01609-JSW

Document 49

Filed 12/22/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

C o u n s e l report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached th e following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: C o u r t Processes: G G T N o n -b in d in g Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) E a rly Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) M e d ia tio n (ADR L.R. 6)

(N o te: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is a p p re c ia b ly more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of N e e d for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) P r iv a t e Process: G P riv ate ADR (please identify process and provider)

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: G th e presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order re f e rr in g the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) T o th e r requested deadline November 1, 2009

Dated: December 22, 2008

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY By /s/ ARA JABAGCHOURIAN Attorneys for Plaintiff Claire C. Haggarty and the Class

23 24 25
UNIT ED
ISTR 22, D a te d : DecemberICT 2008 ES D

S

26 27

T TA

C

KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP. By /s/ WILLIAM M. GOODMAN Attorneys for Defendants Stryker Orthopaedics i

v
L A W O F F IC E S

28

CO TCH ETT, P IT R E & M CCARTH Y

S T I P U L A T ID INT R I C T[PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS, Case No. CV-08-01609 JSW O S AND

ER

N

OF

A

C

LI

FO

Judge Je

W ffrey S.

hite

R NIA

O ORD IT IS S

ERED

RT U O

NO

RT

H