Haggarty v. Stryker Orthopaedics et al
ORDER GRANTING 49 Stipulation selecting Mediation. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/23/08. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2008)
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
F R A N K M. PITRE (#100077) f p itr e @ c p m le g a l.c o m LAURA SCHLICHTMANN (#169699) email@example.com ARA JABAGCHOURIAN (#205777) a ja b a g c h o u r ia n @ c p m le g a l.c o m COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY S a n Francisco Airport Office Center 8 4 0 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 B u rlin g a m e , CA 94010 T e le p h o n e : (650) 697-6000 F a c sim ile : (650) 692-0577 G E O R G E COREY (#34580) firstname.lastname@example.org D A R IO de GHETALDI (#126782) email@example.com C O R E Y , LUZAICH, PLISKA, de GHETALDI & NASTARI, LLP 7 0 0 El Camino Real, P.O. Box 669 M illb ra e , CA 94030 T e le p h o n e (650) 871-5666 A tto r n e ys for Plaintiff and the Class
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT N O R T H E R N DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CLAIRE C. HAGGARTY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS (aka STRYKER ORTHOPEDICS; aka STRYKER ORTHOPEDICS, INC.); HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION; STRYKER CORPORATION; and STRYKER SALES CORPORATION, Defendants.
C a s e No. CV-08-01609 JSW S T IP U L A T I O N AND [PROPOSED] O R D E R SELECTING ADR PROCESS
L A W O F F IC E S
CO TCH ETT, P IT R E & M CCARTH Y S T I P U L A T I O N AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS, Case No. CV-08-01609 JSW
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
C o u n s e l report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached th e following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: C o u r t Processes: G G T N o n -b in d in g Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) E a rly Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) M e d ia tio n (ADR L.R. 6)
(N o te: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is a p p re c ia b ly more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of N e e d for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) P r iv a t e Process: G P riv ate ADR (please identify process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: G th e presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order re f e rr in g the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) T o th e r requested deadline November 1, 2009
Dated: December 22, 2008
COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY By /s/ ARA JABAGCHOURIAN Attorneys for Plaintiff Claire C. Haggarty and the Class
23 24 25
ISTR 22, D a te d : DecemberICT 2008 ES D
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP. By /s/ WILLIAM M. GOODMAN Attorneys for Defendants Stryker Orthopaedics i
L A W O F F IC E S
CO TCH ETT, P IT R E & M CCARTH Y
S T I P U L A T ID INT R I C T[PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS, Case No. CV-08-01609 JSW O S AND
W ffrey S.
O ORD IT IS S
RT U O
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?