Mosley v. Conte

Filing 98

BRIEFING ORDER. Signed by Judge James Larson on 1/26/09. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California Shane D. Mosley, Sr., Plaintiff, v. Victor Conte, Defendant. ________________________________/ No. C 08-1777 JSW (JL) 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BRIEFING ORDER This Court has received a referral from the district court (Hon. Jeffrey S. White) for a Report and Recommendation on Defendant's motion to strike Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to California's Anti-SLAPP statute, California Code of Civil Procedure 425.16. (Docket # 40). This motion was fully briefed before the district court. This referral is in concert with the earlier referral of the parties' cross-motions for sanctions at Docket #s 67 and 76. Plaintiff at the hearing on the motions for sanctions requested an opportunity to submit additional briefing on the motion to strike. Accordingly, this Court hereby grants Plaintiff's request. Within two weeks of the issuance of this order, Plaintiff may submit additional briefing on the motion to strike. Defendant may respond within two weeks and the matter will be submitted. The Court will notify counsel if there is a need for further hearing. Otherwise, the matter will be submitted on the pleadings. C-08-1777 BRIEFING ORDER Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 26, 2009 __________________________________ JAMES LARSON Chief Magistrate Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California G:\JLALL\CHAMBERS\CASES\CIV-REF\08-1777\Order-brief-40.wpd 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C-08-1777 BRIEFING ORDER Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?