GA Escrow, LLC v. Autonomy Corporation PLC

Filing 41

ORDER extending time to answer (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2008)

Case 3:08-cv-01784-SI

Document 40

Filed 12/02/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 DOLL AMIR & ELEY LLP Gregory L. Doll (SBN 193205) 2 [e-mail] Mary Tesh Glarum (SBN 175181) 3 [e-mail] 1888 Century Park East 4 Suite 1106 Los Angeles, California 90067 5 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 6 Attorneys for Defendants AUTONOMY CORPORATION PLC 7 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP 8 Arthur J. Shartsis (SBN 51549) [e-mail] 9 Gregg S. Farano (Bar #221505) [e-mail] 10 Katherine R. Miller (SBN 247390) One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor 11 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff 13 GA ESCROW, LLC 14 15 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. C08-01784-SI CORRECTED SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT AND FILE COUNTERCLAIM Date: December 12, 2008 Time: 2:00 p.m.

GA ESCROW, LLC, a Delaware limited 17 liability company, a Representative for the Escrow Participants, 18 Plaintiff, 19 v. 20 AUTONOMY CORPORATION PLC, a 21 corporation formed under the laws of England and Wales 22 Defendants. 23
24 25 26 27 28

1 AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT

Case 3:08-cv-01784-SI

Document 40

Filed 12/02/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS: 1. On November 7, 2008, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in

part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Defendant's Answer to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is now due on November 24, 2008. Defendant also anticipated filing a counterclaim, also due on November 24, 2008; 2. Counsel of Plaintiff and Defendant are discussing resolving this case through a

potential mediation in New York the first week of December 2008 and working together to schedule such a mediation; and 3. The extension of time is sought in good faith and for reasons set forth above and

not for the purpose of delay, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED: That Defendant's Answer to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and counterclaim are due to be filed on December 4, 2008. Dated: December 2, 2008 Respectfully submitted, DOLL AMIR & ELEY By /s/ Gregory L. Doll Gregory L. Doll Attorneys for Defendant AUTONOMY CORPORATION PLC SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP By /s/ Gregg S. Farano (w/ permission) Gregg S. Farano Attorneys for Plaintiff GA ESCROW, LLC . .

Dated: December 2, 2008

[PROPOSED] ORDER Good cause having been shown, the Defendant's Answer to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and filing of any counterclaim shall be due on December 4, 2008. Dated: _____________________________ _________________________________ The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge

2 AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT