GA Escrow, LLC v. Autonomy Corporation PLC

Filing 45

ORDER continuing cmc (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2008)

Download PDF
Case 3:08-cv-01784-SI Document 43 Filed 12/08/2008 Page 1 of 4 1 DOLL AMIR & ELEY LLP Gregory L. Doll (SBN 193205) 2 gdoll@dollamir.com Mary Tesh Glarum (SBN 175181) 3 mglarum@dollamir.com 1888 Century Park East 4 Suite 1106 Los Angeles, California 90067 5 Telephone: (310) 557-9100 Facsimile: (310) 557-9101 6 Attorneys for Defendants AUTONOMY CORPORATION PLC 7 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP 8 Arthur J. Shartsis (SBN 51549) ashartsis@sflaw.com 9 Gregg S. Farano (Bar #221505) gfarano@sflaw.com 10 Katherine R. Miller (SBN 247390) One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor 11 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 421-6500 12 Facsimile: (415) 421-2922 Attorneys for Plaintiff 13 GA ESCROW, LLC 14 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. C08-01784-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE UNTIL JANUARY 2009 TO FACILITATE MEDIATION Date: December 12, 2008 Time: 2:00 p.m. GA ESCROW, LLC, a Delaware limited 17 liability company, a Representative for the Escrow Participants, 18 Plaintiff, 19 v. 20 AUTONOMY CORPORATION PLC, a 21 corporation formed under the laws of England and Wales 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case 3:08-cv-01784-SI Document 43 Filed 12/08/2008 Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS: 1. On November 7, 2008, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and scheduled a Case Management Conference for this Friday, December 12. 2. The parties are attempting resolving this case through a mediation in New York City. The mediation has been difficult to arrange, given that: (a) Defendants' representative will be flying in from Cambridge, England; (b) documents are being gathered in Cambridge and California to facilitate a productive mediation; and (c) arrangements for all witnesses are being made during the fourth quarter of the business year as well as the holiday season. 3. As a result, the parties respectfully seek a brief continuation of the Case Management Conference until January of 2009. Such a continuance will promote judicial economy (the case may settle, in which event there will be no need to set further dates) and will conserve financial resources of the parties (out-of-town counsel will not need to travel to San Francisco to attend the CMC). 4. The extension of time is sought in good faith and for reasons set forth above and not for the purpose of delay. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED: That the Case Management Conference shall be continued until January of 2009. Dated: December 8, 2008 Respectfully submitted, DOLL AMIR & ELEY /s/ Gregory L. Doll Gregory L. Doll Attorneys for Defendant AUTONOMY CORPORATION PLC By Dated: December 8, 2008 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP By /s/ Gregg S. Farano (w/ permission) Gregg S. Farano Attorneys for Plaintiff GA ESCROW, LLC . . i STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case 3:08-cv-01784-SI Document 43 Filed 12/08/2008 Page 3 of 4 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER Good cause having been shown, the Case Management Conference shall be continued January 30, 2009 3 until _____________________, 2009. 4 Dated: _____________________________ 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ii STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE _________________________________ The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge Case 3:08-cv-01784-SI Document 43 Filed 12/08/2008 Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 1888 Century Park East, Suite 1106, Los Angeles, California 90067. On December 8, 2008, I served the foregoing document(s) described STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE UNTIL JANUARY 2009 TO FACILITATE MEDIATION on the parties in this action by serving: Arthur J. Shartsis, Esq. Gregg S. Farano, Esq. Shartsis Friese LLP One Maritime Plaza, 18th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 () By Envelope: by placing ( ) the original ( ) a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as above and delivering such envelopes: () By Mail: As follows: I am "readily familiar" with this firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Los Angeles, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. () By Personal Service: I delivered such envelope by hand to the offices of the addressee(s). () By Federal Express: I caused the envelope(s) to be delivered to the Federal Express office for delivery on the next-business-day basis to the offices of the addressee(s). ( X ) By CM/ECF: I hereby certify that on December 8, 2008, I electronically transmitted the attached document to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the aforementioned CM/ECF registrants. Executed on December 8, 2008 at Los Angeles, California. () STATE I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. (X) FEDERAL I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. /s/ Susan Reimers Susan Reimers . PROOF OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?