Hoffman v. Sutter Health et al

Filing 18

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/03/08. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ROBOOSTOFF & KALKIN CONSTANTINE V. ROBOOSTOFF - State Bar No. 69328 369 Pine Street, Suite 610 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff SARAH HADASSAH HOFFMAN RIMAC MARTIN, P.C. ANNA M. MARTIN - State Bar No. 154279 WILLIAM REILLY - State Bar No. 177550 [e-mail] 1051 Divisadero Street San Francisco, California 94115 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone] Attorneys for Defendants SUTTER HEALTH and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

E -F IL IN G
SARAH HADASSAH HOFFMAN, Plaintiff, vs. SUTTER HEALTH, UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIM ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. CV 08 1811 CRB STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the plaintiff SARAH HADASSAH HOFFMAN and defendants SUTTER HEALTH and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, through their respective counsel of record, that the captioned action, including -1S T I P U L A T I O N OF DISM I S S A L OF ACTION W I T H PREJUDICE; ORDER C A S E NO. CV 08 1811 CRB

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

the counter-claim, may be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties shall bear their own respective costs of suit. Pursuant to local rules, this document is being electronically filed through the Court's ECF System. In this regard, counsel for defendant hereby attests that (1) the content of this document is acceptable to all persons required to sign the document; (2) plaintiff's counsel has concurred with the filing of this document; and (3) a record supporting this concurrence is available for inspection or production if so ordered. ROBOOSTOFF & KALKIN

DATED: October 30, 2008

By:

/S/ CONSTANTINE V. ROBOOSTOFF CONSTANTINE V. ROBOOSTOFF Attorneys for Plaintiff SARAH HADASSAH HOFFMAN RIMAC & MARTIN, P.C.

DATED: October 30, 2008

By:

/S/ WILLIAM REILLY WILLIAM REILLY Attorneys for Defendants SUTTER HEALTH and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ____________________ Nov. 03, 2008

UNIT ED

CHARLES R. BREYER Federal Judge, U.S. District CourtD E

S

S DISTRICT TE C A __________T ________________________ _

RT U O

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

-2S T I P U L A T I O N OF DISM I S S A L OF ACTION W I T H PREJUDICE; ORDER C A S E NO. CV 08 1811 CRB

A

C

LI

FO

harles Judge C

R. Brey

er

R NIA

OO IT IS S

RDER

NO

RT

H