Advantage Battery Corp., Inc. v. Steelscape, Inc.

Filing 65

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION. Pursuant to stipulation, the action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 29, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 LAW OFFICES 600 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400 Costa Mesa, California 92626-7689 (714) 427-7000 Timothy G. O'Neill (admitted pro hac vice) James D. Kilroy (admitted pro hac vice) SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 1200 Seventeeth Street, Suite 1950 Denver, Colorado 80202 Telephone: (303) 634-2000 Facsimile: (303) 634-2020 jkilroy@swlaw.com Sean M. Sherlock (#161627) Elizabeth M. Weldon (#223452) SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 600 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400 Costa Mesa, California 92626-7689 Telephone: (714) 427-7000 Facsimile: (714) 427-7799 eweldon@swlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Advantage Battery Corp., Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ADVANTAGE BATTERY CORP., INC., vs. Plaintiff, CASE NO. C08-01827 MMC Hon. Maxine M. Chesney, Ctrm. 7 [Proposed] Order Re Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice Complaint Filed: April 4, 2008 Trial Date: September 14, 2009 (Case Management Conference: January 8, 2010) Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STEELSCAPE, INC., Defendant. AND RELATED THIRD PARTY ACTION. Having considered the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice submitted by Plaintiff Advantage Battery Corp., Inc. ("Advantage Battery") and Defendant Steelscape, Inc. ("Steelscape"), and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ORDERED that the Complaint in this matter be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 11022410.1 December 29 , 20__ 09 Hon. Maxine M. Chesney [Proposed] Order re Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?