Campanelli et al v. The Hershey Company

Filing 454

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman in case 3:08-cv-01862-BZ; granting (63) Motion to Appear by Telephone in case 3:11-cv-05117-BZ (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THE BRANDI LAW FIRM THOMAS J. BRANDI (CA Bar No. 53208) BRIAN J. MALLOY (CA Bar No. 234882) 354 Pine Street, Third Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 989-1800 Facsimile: (415) 707-2024 Email: tjb@brandilaw.com HOBAN & FEOLA, LLC DAVID C. FEOLA* (CO Bar No. 18789) 1626 Wazee Street, Suite 2A Denver, Colorado 80202 Phone: 303-674-7000, Ext. 2 Facsimile: 303-382-4685 Email: David@Feolalaw.com 11 * Pro hac vice application pending 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 RYAN ZULEWSKI, et al., ) Case No.: 3:11-cv-05117 ) ) REQUEST FOR COURT CALL APPEARANCE ) ) ) ) ) 16 17 Plaintiffs, 18 v. 19 THE HERSHEY COMPANY, 20 Defendant. 21 22 23 Plaintiffs’ counsel, Thomas J. Brandi and Brian J. Malloy, hereby request permission to appear by telephone at the March 7, 2012 case management conference. Both Mr. Brandi and Mr. Malloy have a trial 24 beginning on February 27, 2012 in Humboldt County, California that will last approximately two weeks. 25 26 27 The trial day lasts from 8:30 to 12:00, so Plaintiffs’ counsel will be available for the 4:00 p.m. starting time on March 7, 2012. 28 1 REQUEST FOR COURT CALL APPEARANCE - Case No.: 3:11-cv-05117 1 Dated: February 13, 2012 THE BRANDI LAW FIRM 2 3 By: /s/ Brian J. Malloy Brian J. Malloy 4 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 erman LI ER REQUEST IS GRANTED - NO OPPOSITION. FO imm ernard Z Judge B H 12 RT 11 TED GRAN NO 10 DATED: 2/16/2012 A 9 UNIT ED 8 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 7 S 6 R NIA 5 N F D IS T IC T O R C 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 REQUEST FOR COURT CALL APPEARANCE - Case No.: 3:11-cv-05117

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?