Moody v. County of San Mateo et al

Filing 83

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO SUBMIT RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO STRIKE EVIDENCE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 18, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2009)

DEPUTIES COUNTY COUNSEL
MICHAEL P. MURPHY
KATHRYN E. ALBERTI REBECCA M. ARCHER A I M E E B . A RMSBY CLAIRE A. CUNNINGHAM PETER K. FINCK T IMOTHY J . F OX PORTOR GOLTZ JUDITH A. HOLIBER DAVID A. LEVY GLENN M. LEVY K I M B E R L Y A . M ARL O W J OHN D . N IBBELIN PAUL A. OKADA D A V I D A . S ILBERMAN WILLIAM E. SMITH V. RAYMOND SWOPE III LEE A. THOMPSON E UGENE W H I T L O C K B R I A N J . WO N G CAROL L. WOODWARD

CHIEF DEPUTIES
JOHN C. BEIERS DEBORAH PENNY BENNETT BRENDA B. CARLSON

COUNTY C O U N S E L
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
HALL OF JUSTICE AND RECORDS · 6TH FLOOR 400 COUNTY CENTER · REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063-1662 TELEPHONE: [phone] · FACSIMILE: [phone]

PLEASE REPLY TO [phone]

November 18, 2009

Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 450 Golden Gate Ave. Courtroom 7, 19th Floor San Francisco, CA 94102 Re: Moody v. County of San Mateo, et al. Case No. C-08-1864 MMC

Dear Judge Chesney: We have received Plaintiff Stacey Moody's Surreply, filed in this matter on November 16, 2009. In addition to addressing issues set forth in the November 5, 2009 Order, the Surreply also argues that the Court must strike evidence set forth in the County of San Mateo's reply papers, filed on October 23, 2009. The County of San Mateo respectfully requests an opportunity to submit an opposition to this de facto motion to strike. This response would be in the form of a brief no more than two pages in length and would be filed within 24 hours of receiving permission from the Court to submit it. Very truly yours, MICHAEL P. MURPHY, COUNTY COUNSEL

By:

/s/ DAVID A. LEVY, DEPUTY
S
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

MPM:DAL/sc
UNIT ED

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

Dated: November 18, 2009

Judge M

axine M

. Chesn

ey

R NIA

cc: Waukeen Q. McCoy John A. Shupe

OO IT IS S

RDERE

D

RT U O

NO

RT
H