Byers et al v. Service Employees International Union et al
STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time to Respond to Third Amended Complaint (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Robert M. Weinberg (admitted pro hac vice) Leon Dayan (admitted pro hac vice) BREDHOFF & KAISER, PLLC 805 Fifteenth Street, NW, Tenth Floor Washington, D.C. 20008 Telephone: (202) 842-2600 Facsimile: (202) 842-1888 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com Glenn Rothner (CSB No. 67353) ROTHNER, SEGALL & GREENSTONE 510 South Marengo Avenue Pasadena, CA 91101 Telephone: (626) 796-7555 Facsimile: (626) 577-0124 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Attorneys for Defendants 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Third Amended Complaint - Case No.. 08 01870 SC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL ) UNION, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) BYERS et al., CASE NO. CV 08 1870 (SC) STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT [Local Rule 6-1(a)]
1 2 3 4 5 6
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1 (a), counsel for Defendants hereby advise the Court that the parties have stipulated that the deadline of the defendants to file their pleading responsive to the first amended complaint in this matter shall be extended for one week, to and including February 20, 2009. The parties intend to confer next week on a proposed schedule for the filing of and response to a Fourth Amended Complaint.
Dated: February 13, 2009 7 8 9 10 11
Respectfully submitted, By_/s/ Leon Dayan____________ ROBERT M. WEINBERG LEON DAYAN BREDHOFF & KAISER, PLLC GLENN ROTHNER(CSB No. 67353) ROTHNER, SEGALL & GREENSTONE Attorneys for Defendants
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T
RT U O
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
F D IS T IC T O R
Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint - Case No.. 08 01870 SC
IT IS S
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?