Jackson et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 57

DISCOVERY ORDER re 56 Letter filed by City and County of San Francisco. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 9/23/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2010)

Jackson et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Doc. 57

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. vs. SHAWN MYERS, et al., Plaintiffs,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C 08-1163 MEJ C 09-1916 MEJ Related Cases ORDER RE: DISCOVERY FILINGS

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants. /

JAMAL JACKSON, et al., Plaintiffs,

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants. ______________________________________/ The Court is in receipt of the parties' individual discovery dispute letters, filed September 22 and 23, 2010. As the letters do not comply with the undersigned's discovery standing order, they shall not be considered. Specifically, In the event that the parties are unable to proceed with the meet and confer/joint letter process, the moving party shall file a written request for a telephonic conference for the purpose of enforcing the Court's meet and confer requirement, or for the Court to fashion an alternative procedure which satisfies this requirement. (Discovery Standing Order, ¶ 3.) Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to file joint letters on the disputes addressed in the individual letters by September 30, 2010. If unable to file joint letters, the moving party shall comply with the discovery standing order to request an alternative procedure. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 23, 2010 MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge

Dockets.Justia.com