California Sportfishing Protection Alliance et al v. Chu et al

Filing 20

ORDER re 19 dismissing all claims pursuant to stipulation (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties in the above-captioned matter have entered into a settlement agreement and stipulated and agreed to dismiss plaintiffs' claims as set forth in the notice and compliant, Doc #1, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2). Doc #19 at 2. The U S Department CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation; STRAWBERRY CANYON STEWARDSHIP GROUP, an unincorporated association, Plaintiffs, v STEVEN CHU, in his official capacity as Director, LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY, a federal agency, Defendants. / No C-08-1963 VRW ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA of Justice reviewed the settlement pursuant to 40 CFR 135.5 and indicated to the court that it had no objection to the settlement's terms. Doc #18. The parties request the court retain jurisdiction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 over the matter through October 15, 2011 for the sole purpose of resolving disputes between the parties with respect to enforcement of the settlement agreement. Doc #19 at 2. The court hereby ORDERS plaintiffs' claims against defendants dismissed with prejudice. The court shall retain jurisdiction over the matter through October 15, 2011 for the sole purpose of enforcing compliance with the settlement agreement, but the clerk is ORDERED administratively to close the file and TERMINATE all motions. IT IS SO ORDERED. VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?