Shanghai Win-Wing Imp. & Exp. Co, Ltd v. Watanabe et al

Filing 17

ORDER taking case management conference off calendar. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2008)

Download PDF
3DWARD E. COREY (SB #124900) :OREY b COREY !560 Wilshire Boulevard 17th Floor .os Angeles, CA 90010 (213) 385-7003 lL13) 385-6908 Fax :ounsel for SHANGHAI WIN-WING IMP. :%P. CO, LTD., Plalntlff. L UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7HAIIGHAI WIEi-WING IMP. 3XP. CO, LTD., Plaintiff, & ) No. 08-CV-02031-SC i ) ) EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE rETSUYA WATANABE, OAKHILLS HARDWOOD ) 'LOORS, INC., K&T ASSOCIATES, INC. ! 1 Defendants. ) Now comes Plaintiff Shanghai Win-Wing Imp. a Exp. Co., by and ~hroughco)lnsel, and moves this Court for an Order continuing the Case 4anagement Conference scheduled for September 19, 2008 at 10:09 A.M. Plaintiff has submitted concurrently with this application to zontinue an application f ~ default judnment in this matter which will r jispose of this matter in entirety. The Court has scheduled the \pplication for Default Judgment for November 7, 2008 at 10:00 A.M. ,~hlchis after the scheduled Case Management Conference. Eeclaration >f Edward E. Corey, 771. 1 EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE CMC P l a i n t i f f and i t s counsel s u g a e s t t h a t given t h e scheduled l e f a u l t Application which w i l l l i k e l y d l s p o s e of t h e e n t i r e a c t i o n , it i o u l d b e more efficient i f t h e C a s e Management C o n f e r e n c e was zontinued t o a d a t e beyond t h e c u r r e n t l y scheduled A p p l i c a t i o n f o r lefault. :o D e c l a r a t l o n o f Edward E . C o r e y , 2 . T h e r e w?uld b e n o t h i n g r e p o r t a t t h e C a s e Management C o n f e r e n c e o t h e r t h a n t h e f a c t s a s I f t h e Default s t a t e d h e r e i n . D e c l a r a t l o n o f Edward E. C o r e y , 3 . Judgment i s g r a n t e d a s a p p l i e d f o r , t h e C a s e Management C c n f e r e n c e i o u l d be moot. D e c l a r a t i o n o f Edward E . Core);, 4. A s s u c h , P l a i n t i f f mcxres t h e C o u r t f o r a c o n t i n u a n c e o f t h e C a s e qanagement C o n f e r e n c e t o d a t e b e y o n d Ehe s c h e d u l e d a p p l i c a t i o n f o r j e f a u l t j u d g m e n t o f November 7 , 2 0 0 8 . 3ated: S e p t e m b e r 3 , 2008 COREY & COREY ~ ; t o r n e . i s f o r ~1aljf;)lff S h a n g h a i Win-Wing I m p . 6 Exp. Co.. Ltd. IJpon g o o d c a u s e s h o w i n g , r h e C a s e Management C o n f e r e n c e ; c k e d u l r d i n t h i s m a t t e r i n c o n t i n u e d t.,> - CALENDAR , Z { J O D a t OFF -. . L0:OIJ A.M. I t is so ordered. S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O - ER N F D IS T IC T O R 2 EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE CMC A C LI FO muel Co Judge Sa nti R NIA ERED .JUDGE SAMUEL OCOLJTI O RD IT IS S NO UNIT ED - -- RT H DECLARATION OF EDWARD COREY I, Edward E. Corey, am counsel of record for the 'laintiff in this matter and have personal knowledge of the facts set forth helow. If called upon as a witness, 1 would zompetently testify as follows: 1. Plaintiff has submitted concurrently with this 3ppllcation t.o continue an application for default judgment in :his matter which will dispose of this matter in entirety. The lcurt has scheduled the Applicatien for Default Judgment for qovember 7, 2008 at 10:00 A.M. which is after the scheduled Case 4anagement Conference. 2. Plaintiff and its counsel suggest that given the scheduled Default Application which will likely dispise of the 3ntire action, it would be more efficient if the Case Management lonference was continued to a date beyond the currently scheduled ipplication for Default. 3. There would be nothing to report at the Case 4anagement Conference other than the facts as stated herein. 4. If the Default ,Judgment is granted as applled tor, the Case Management Conference would be moot. I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws ~f the United States that the foregc,ing is true and correct. Executed this 3 " day of September, 2008 at Los ' Jngeles, califcrnia. - Edward E. Corey, 3 EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE CMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EDWARD E. COREY (SB #124900) COREY & COREY 3580 Wilshire Boulevard 17th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90010 (213) 385-7003 (213) 385-6908 Fax Counsel for SHANGHAI WIN-WING IMP. & EXP. CO, LTD., Plaintiff. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHANGHAI WIN-WING IMP. & EXP. CO, LTD., ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) TETSUYA WATANABE, OAKHILLS ) HARDWOOD FLOORS, INC., K&T ) ASSOCIATES, INC. ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________ ) No. 08-CV-02031-SC ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE SEPTEMBER 19, 2008 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES Upon review of Plaintiff's Motion for Continuing the Order of April 18, 2008, Settling Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, and for good cause shown, said deadlines are continued pending further Order of the Court. It is so ordered. _______________________________ Judge Hon. Samuel Conti 1 O R D E R ON EX PARTE APPLICATION CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?