GoClear LLC v. Target Corporation

Filing 44

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR GOCLEAR LLC TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION; AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO JANUARY 16, 2009. GoClear will have until and including December 29, 2008 to file its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment. Further, the hearing on plaintiff's motion is continued to January 16, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 23, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Jennifer Lee Taylor (Bar No. 161368) JTaylor@mofo.com Kimberly L. Taylor (Bar No. 240483) KTaylor@mofo.com 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 Attorneys for Defendant TARGET CORPORATION LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Kenneth M. Fitzgerald (Bar No. 142505) kenneth.fitzgerald@lw.com 600 West Broadway, Suite 1800 San Diego, California 92101 Telephone: (619) 236-1234 Facsimile: (619) 696-7419 James L. Day (Bar No. 197158) jim.day@lw.com Tienlon Ho (Bar No. 240997) tienlon.ho@lw.com Kateryna L. Rakowsky (Bar No. 246248) kateryna.rakowsky@lw.com 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 391-0600 Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 Attorneys for Plaintiff GOCLEAR LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT L A W S AN F R A N C I S C O GOCLEAR LLC, a California limited liability company, Plaint iff, v. TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. CASE NO. CV 08-02134 MMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR GOCLEAR LLC TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO JANUARY 16, 2009 STIPULATION AND ORDER Case No. CV 08-02134 MMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT L A W S AN F R A N C I S C O Plaint iff GoClear LLC ("GoClear") and defendant Target Corporation ("Target") enter into this Stipulation by and through their undersigned counsel. WHEREAS, GoClear filed, on December 2, 2008, a motion for summary judgment with the hearing scheduled for January 9, 2009; WHEREAS, Target filed its opposition to GoClear's motion on December 19, 2008; WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(c), the deadline for GoClear to file a reply in support of its motion was originally December 26, 2008; WHEREAS, counsel for GoClear recently learned that the Court will be closed on December 26, 2008, resulting in new deadline for the reply o f December 24, 2008; WHEREAS, Target agrees that GoClear may have until December 29, 2008 to file and serve its reply brief; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree as follows: 1. GoClear will have until and including December 29, 2008 to file its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment. 2. Other deadlines will remain unchanged. IT IS SO STIPULATED Dated: December 22, 2008 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP By: /s/ James L. Day Attorneys for Plaintiff GoClear LLC Dated December 22, 2008 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Jennifer Lee Taylor Attorneys for Defendant Target Corporation Pursuant to Northern Dist. General Order 45-X(B), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the individuals identified above. /s/ Kateryna L. Rakowsky STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 Case No. CV 08-02134 MMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT L A W S AN F R A N C I S C O ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Further, the hearing on plaintiff's motion is CONTINUED to January 16, 2009. ___________________________________ Date : December 23, 2008 The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney STIPULATION AND ORDER 2 Case No. CV 08-02134 MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?