Continental D.I.A. Diamond Products, Inc. v. Dong Young Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 73

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 12/19/08 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge CONTINENTAL D.I.A. DIAMOND PRODUCTS, INC., v. Plaintiff, No. C 08-02136 SI ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DONG YOUNG DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., DONGSOO LEE, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. / Defendants have filed a motion for the Court to reconsider its November 26, 2008 Order [Docket No. 68] regarding plaintiff's proposed protective order. Defendants have failed to comply with Local Civil Rule No. 7-9, which requires parties to seek leave of the Court before filing such a motion. Leave would not be granted in this case, where defendants have failed to demonstrate the existence of a material difference in fact or law or a manifest failure by the Court to consider material facts or dispositive legal arguments. See Local Civil Rule No. 7-9(b). Defendants claim that the Court failed to consider defendants' request that foreign counsel should be afforded the same access to protected materials as U.S. counsel. The Court rejected this request, finding that defendants had not demonstrated that the Court can enforce the terms of a protective order on lawyers outside its jurisdiction. See Nov. 26 Order, at *2. Accordingly, defendants' motion is DENIED.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?