Jordan v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA

Filing 150

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 149 Stipulation, filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/27/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2011)

Case3:08-cv-02142-EMC Document149-1

Filed10/24/11 Page1 of 2

1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
2
3
4
5
6

A Limited Liability Partnership
Including Professional Corporations
MOLLY R. NEWLAND, Cal. Bar No. 244928
[e-mail]
SHANNON Z. PETERSEN, Cal. Bar No. 211426
[e-mail]
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4109
Telephone:
415-434-9100
Facsimile:
415-434-3947

7 LEANN PEDERSEN POPE (admitted pro hac vice)
8
9
10
11
12

[e-mail]
VICTORIA COLLADO (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
ANDREW D. LEMAR (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
BURKE, WARREN, MACKAY & SERRITELLA, P.C.
330 North Wabash, 22nd Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60611
Telephone:
312-840-7000
Facsimile:
312-840-7900

13 Attorneys for Defendant

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18 KAREN L. JONES-BOYLE, individually, and

Case No. C-08-02142-EMC

19

CLASS ACTION

on behalf of all others similarly situated,

20

Plaintiffs,
v.

21

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA, and
22 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Defendants.

23
24

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AS TO
PLAINTIFF AND WITHOUT
PREJUDICE AS TO THE PUTATIVE
CLASS MEMBERS, PURSUANT TO FED.
R. CIV. PROC. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
Courtroom C, 15th Floor

25

Hon. Edward M. Chen

26

Complaint Filed: April 24, 2008

27
28
W02-WEST:5MON1\404065168.1

C-08-02142-EMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

Case3:08-cv-02142-EMC Document149-1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3
4
5

Filed10/24/11 Page2 of 2

Based on the stipulation of Plaintiff Karen Jones-Boyle ("Plaintiff") and Defendant
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase"), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this action is hereby dismissed, with prejudice as to Plaintiff's claims and without
prejudice as to the claims of the putative class members.

6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.

8

S

RT

dwa
Judge E

ER

15

A

H

14

hen

rd M. C

NO

13

R NIA

12

FO

11

_______________________________________
DERED
SO ORCHEN
JUDGE IT IS
EDWARD M.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

LI

10/27/11
Dated: ____________________

UNIT
ED

10

RT
U
O

9

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1W02-WEST:5MON1\404065168.1

C-08-02142-EMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL