Frederick v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 78

ORDER GRANTING 76 MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Vaughn R. Walker for Maxine M. Chesney on July 14, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2010)

Frederick v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Doc. 78

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 July 14, 2010 Dated: _______________ f__ __V_______._Wal________or ____________________ _ aughn R ___ ker THE HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge
1 [Proposed] Order Granting Def.'s Mot. Stay Disc. (C 08-2222 MMC (PR))

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JERRY M. FREDERICK,

C 08-2222 MMC (PR) Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A STAY OF DISCOVERY PENDING RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION,

Defendant.

Defendant California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) filed a motion for an order staying discovery pending the Court's ruling on CDCR's fully briefed motion for summary judgment. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, CDCR's motion to stay discovery is GRANTED, and discovery, including all discovery motions, is stayed pending the Court's ruling on CDCR's motion for summary judgment.

Dockets.Justia.com