Duncan v. Cohen et al
ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Settlement Conference set for 11/3/2008 09:30 AM. Meet and Confer by 10/17/2008. Updated Confidential Settlement Conference Statement due by10/27/2008. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 9/25/08. (fj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2008)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 v. THOMAS A COHEN Defendant(s) ___________________________________/ TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: You are hereby notified that the conference previously scheduled for September 29, 2008 has been continued until November 3, 2008 at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102. Lead trial counsel are required to appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties who have unlimited authority to negotiate and settle the case. Not later than October 17, 2008, lead trial counsel are required to meet and confer, in person, regarding the draft settlement. They may bring their clients to the meeting if they desire. On or before October 27, 2008, each party must deliver directly to Magistrate Judge Spero's Chambers an Updated Confidential Settlement Conference Statement. This Statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court and need not be served upon the other parties. The parties are directed to notify Magistrate Judge Spero's Chambers immediately at (415) 522-3691 if this case settles prior to the date set for the Settlement Conference. All other provisions of this Court's July 22, 2008 "Notice of Settlement Conference and Settlement Conference Order" remain in effect. Dated: September 25, 2008 DAVID JAMES DUNCAN Plaintiff(s), ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE No. 08-02243 (JCS) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Joseph C. Spero United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?