Fallay v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 125

ORDER VACATING HEARING RE APPEAL BOND. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/18/2011. (crblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 15 ORDER VACATING HEARING RE APPEAL BOND Plaintiff, 13 14 No. C 08-2261 CRB AUGUSTINE FALLAY, v. SAN FRANCISCO CITY AND COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 17 / Defendants Tony Fu and Crystal Lei filed a joint motion for appeal bond pursuant to 18 Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 7. See dkt. 124. That motion is currently calendared 19 for Friday, August 19, 2011. Id. Plaintiff Augustine Fallay has not filed an Opposition. 20 Upon being contacted by the Court, Plaintiff stated that he had not been served with the 21 motion. Defendants conceded that they did not file a proof of service into the correct docket, 22 but on Tuesday, August 16, 2011, they hand-delivered to the Court a proof of service filed in 23 another case, before another judge. See Case No. 3:11-cv-01814-RS dkt. 19. This 24 document, the electronic copy of which does not include this case number, does not 25 adequately demonstrate to the Court that Plaintiff was served with the motion. Accordingly, 26 the hearing currently set for Friday, August 19, 2011, is VACATED. If Defendants would 27 like to pursue their motion, they must re-notice it for at least 35 days hence, and they must 28 // 1 2 properly serve the Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: August 18, 2010 CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\CRBALL\2008\2261\Order vacating motion re appeal bond.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?