Fallay v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
125
ORDER VACATING HEARING RE APPEAL BOND. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/18/2011. (crblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
15
ORDER VACATING HEARING RE
APPEAL BOND
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. C 08-2261 CRB
AUGUSTINE FALLAY,
v.
SAN FRANCISCO CITY AND COUNTY,
et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
/
Defendants Tony Fu and Crystal Lei filed a joint motion for appeal bond pursuant to
18
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 7. See dkt. 124. That motion is currently calendared
19
for Friday, August 19, 2011. Id. Plaintiff Augustine Fallay has not filed an Opposition.
20
Upon being contacted by the Court, Plaintiff stated that he had not been served with the
21
motion. Defendants conceded that they did not file a proof of service into the correct docket,
22
but on Tuesday, August 16, 2011, they hand-delivered to the Court a proof of service filed in
23
another case, before another judge. See Case No. 3:11-cv-01814-RS dkt. 19. This
24
document, the electronic copy of which does not include this case number, does not
25
adequately demonstrate to the Court that Plaintiff was served with the motion. Accordingly,
26
the hearing currently set for Friday, August 19, 2011, is VACATED. If Defendants would
27
like to pursue their motion, they must re-notice it for at least 35 days hence, and they must
28
//
1
2
properly serve the Plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: August 18, 2010
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
G:\CRBALL\2008\2261\Order vacating motion re appeal bond.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?