Labrador v. Seattle Mortgage Company
Filing
136
ORDER re 135 Brief, filed by Mary B. Labrador (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2011)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
MARY LABRADOR, individually and on ) Case No. 08-2270 SC
behalf of all others similarly
)
situated,
) ORDER APPROVING
) SUPPLEMENTAL DISTRIBUTION
Plaintiff,
) AND ALLOCATION
) OF CY PRES FUNDS
v.
)
)
SEATTLE MORTGAGE COMPANY,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
14
15
On March 4, 2011, the Court finally approved the settlement of
16
this certified class action.
17
pres distribution absent court approval and instructed Plaintiff
18
Mary Labrador ("Plaintiff") to file a motion for cy pres
19
distribution when the Settlement Administrator, Rust Consulting,
20
determined that settlement residue was ripe for cy pres
21
distribution.
22
ECF No. 128.
The Court barred any cy
ECF No. 134.
Plaintiff now declares that Settlement Fund residue is ripe
23
for distribution, and she proposes a supplemental distribution to
24
class members who cashed the initial settlement check, with the
25
residue of this supplemental distribution distributed to cy pres
26
beneficiaries.
27
exists $419,200 in Settlement Fund residue, and that a distribution
28
of this residue to the 9,965 class members who cashed the first
ECF No. 135.
Plaintiff claims that there currently
1
settlement check would yield an average supplemental distribution
2
of $38.
3
distribution to be $28,000.
6
Rust Consulting estimates the cost of such a
Id.
Having reviewed the papers submitted, the Court GRANTS
4
5
Id. at 2.
Plaintiff's Motion and ORDERS as follows:
•
Settlement Administrator Rust Consulting shall perform a
members who cashed their initial distribution checks.
9
the initial distribution, these supplemental payments shall be
10
United States District Court
supplemental distribution of the residue to the 9,965 class
8
For the Northern District of California
7
based on the comparative size of the loan origination fee the
11
class member was charged, with a minimum distribution of $15.
12
•
As with
Absent approval of the Court, the costs paid to Rust
13
Consulting for administering this distribution shall not
14
exceed $28,000.
15
•
If more than $10,000 remains in residue upon completion of
16
this supplemental distribution, Plaintiff and Rust Consulting
17
shall file declarations apprising the Court of the current
18
state of the Settlement Fund.
19
this residue shall be distributed in equal shares to the
20
National Consumer Law Center and Healthcare and Elder Law
21
Programs Corporation as cy pres beneficiaries.
If less than $10,000 remains,
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
Dated: August 31, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?