Labrador v. Seattle Mortgage Company

Filing 138

ORDER re 137 Approving Final Distribution of Cy Pres Award. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 4/5/2012. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2012)

Download PDF
CHAVEZ & GERTLER LLP 1 MARK A. CHAVEZ (Bar No. 90858) NANCE F. BECKER (Bar No. 99292) 2 42 Miller Ave. Mill Valley, California 94941 3 Telephone: (415) 381-5599 mark@chavezgertler.com 4 nance@chavezgertler.com 5 SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL 6 BRAYTON KONECKY LLP MARK T. JOHNSON (Bar No. 76904) 7 180 Montgomery Street – Ste. 2000 San Francisco, CA 94104 8 Telephone: (415) 421-7100 mjohnson@schneiderwallace.com 9 GARRETT W. WOTKYNS (admitted pro hac vice) 8501 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 270 10 Scottsdale, AZ 85253 Telephone: (480) 428-0141 11 gwotkyns@schneiderwallace.com 12 BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN & BALINT, PC 13 ANDREW S. FRIEDMAN (admitted pro hac vice) 2901 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1000 14 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Telephone: (602) 274-1100 15 afriedman@bffb.com 16 17 Attorneys for Plaintiff 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 MARY B. LABRADOR, individually and on ) Case No.: C-08-2270-SC ) 21 behalf of all others similarly situated, 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, vs. SEATTLE MORTGAGE COMPANY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING OF DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF FINAL DISTRIBUTION OF CY PRES AWARD AND PROPOSED ORDER THEREON [No hearing required] Hon. Samuel Conti PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING OF DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF FINAL DISTRIBUTION OF CY PRES AWARD Case No.: C-08-2270-SC 1 Plaintiff submits the declarations of Class Counsel and the Settlement Administrator 2 in accordance with the Court’s Order Approving Supplemental Distribution and Allocation 3 of Cy Pres Funds (ECF Doc. No. 136). 4 The Court granted final approval of the parties’ settlement agreement on January 19, 5 2011, and has since then been supervising the distribution of the Fund to the settlement class 6 members. On August 31, 2011, the Court entered the above Order, which provides that: 7 8 9 10 11 If more than $10,000 remains in residue upon completion of this supplemental distribution, Plaintiff and Rust Consulting shall file declarations apprising the Court of the current state of the Settlement Fund. If less than $10,000 remains, this residue shall be distributed in equal shares to the National Consumer Law Center and Healthcare and Elder Law Programs Corporation as cy pres beneficiaries. As set forth in the Declarations of Class Counsel Nance F. Becker and Settlement 12 Administrator Kimberly Ness filed herewith, following the second distribution approved by 13 the Court, there is a balance of $ 32,555.44 in the Settlement Fund. Plaintiff, accordingly, 14 renews her request that, based on their demonstrated commitment to advocating for the rights 15 of senior citizen consumers, including but not limited to protection against financial abuses, 16 NCLC and H.E.L.P. again be approved as the recipients of the cy pres funds in this matter, 17 and the Court authorize the distribution of the funds to those organizations in equal shares 18 forthwith. 19 Respectfully submitted, 20 Dated: April 3, 2012 21 CHAVEZ & GERTLER LLP BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN & BALINT, PC 22 23 SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL BRAYTON KONECKY LLP 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ Nance F. Becker Nance F. Becker Attorneys for Plaintiff 1 PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING OF DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF FINAL DISTRIBUTION OF CY PRES AWARD Case No.: C-08-2270-SC 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 3 Good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 7 Date: April 5, 2012 _____________________________ Hon. Samuel Conti United States District Court Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING OF DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF FINAL DISTRIBUTION OF CY PRES AWARD Case No.: C-08-2270-SC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?