Jordan v. Sutter Health et al

Filing 19

ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 17, 2008. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RIMAC MARTIN, P.C. JOSEPH M. RIMAC - State Bar No. 72381 ANNA M. MARTIN - State Bar No. 154279 1051 Divisadero Street San Francisco, California 94115 Telephone (415) 561-8440 Facsimile (415) 561-8430 Email: amartin@rimacmartin.com Attorneys for Defendants SUTTER HEALTH; SUTTER HEALTH LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN; and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA LAW OFFICE OF GEOFFREY V. WHITE GEOFFREY V. WHITE - State Bar No. 068012 351 California Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 362-5638 Facsimile: (415) 362-4115 Email: gvwhite@sprynet.com Attorney for Plaintiff CATHERINE JORDAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA E -F IL IN G CATHERINE JORDAN, ) ) CASE NO. CV 08-2273 WHA Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH ) PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER SUTTER HEALTH, a California corporation; ) SUTTER HEALTH LONG-TERM DISABILITY ) PLAN; and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE ) COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Maine ) corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________________ ) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the plaintiff CATHERINE JORDAN and defendants SUTTER HEALTH, SUTTER HEALTH LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN, and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, through their respective counsel S T I P U L A T I O N AND ORDER OF DISM I S S A L W I T H PREJUDICE -1- C A S E NO. CV 08-2273 WHA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 of record, that the captioned action may be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties shall bear their own respective costs of suit. Pursuant to local rules, this document is being electronically filed through the Court's ECF System. In this regard, counsel for defendant hereby attests that (1) the content of this document is acceptable to all persons required to sign the document; (2) plaintiff's counsel has concurred with the filing of this document; and (3) a record supporting this concurrence is available for inspection or production if so ordered. SO STIPULATED. RIMAC MARTIN a Professional Corporation DATED: November 13, 2008 13 14 15 16 By: /S/ ANNA M. MARTIN ANNA M. MARTIN Attorneys for Defendants SUTTER HEALTH; SUTTER HEALTH LONGTERM DISABILITY PLAN; and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA LAW OFFICE OF GEOFFREY V. WHITE 17 18 19 20 21 22 UNIT ED ISTRIC ES D TC AT T DATED: October 17, 2008 By: /S/ GEOFFREY V. WHITE GEOFFREY V. WHITE Attorney for Plaintiff CATHERINE JORDAN RT U O 23 24 25 26 27 28 November 17, 2008 DATED: ____________________ IT IS SO ORDERED. ORDER S _______________________________________ E UNITED STATESRDISTRICT COURT JUDGE C N F D IS T IC T O R A S T I P U L A T I O N AND ORDER OF DISM I S S A L W I T H PREJUDICE -2- C A S E NO. CV 08-2273 WHA LI FO Judge W illiam A lsup R NIA OO IT IS S RDERE D NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?