United States for the use of Roofing Constructors, Inc. v. Dick/Morganti/Nibbi, A Joint Venture et al

Filing 10

ORDER Further Extending Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines re 9 Stipulation, filed by Dick/Morganti/Nibbi, A Joint Venture, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, United States for the use of Roofing Constructors, Inc., Continental Casualty Company, Nibbi Bros., Inc., Morganti Texas, Inc., Dick Corporation, American Casualty Company of Reading Pennsylvania. Signed by Judge James Larson on 9/29/08. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2008)

Download PDF
Case 3:08-cv-02286-JL Document 9 Filed 09/23/2008 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES, for the Use of ROOFING CONSTRUCTORS, INC., a California Corporation, doing business as WESTERN ROOFING SERVICE, vs. Plaintiffs, Case No.: 08-CV-2286 JL XXXXXXXX STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING CASE SCHEDULE, CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA--SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION DICK/MORGANTI/NIBBI, a joint venture, DICK CORPORATION; MORGANTI TEXAS, INC., NIBBI BROS., INC.; AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PA, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY; NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, Defendants. The parties, Use Plaintiff Roofing Constructors, Inc., a California Corporation, doing business as Western Roofing Service, on the one hand, and Defendants Dick/Morganti/Nibbi, a Joint Venture; Dick Corporation; Morganti Texas, Inc.; Nibbi Bros., Inc.; American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania; Continental Casualty Company; National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, on the other, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: This case arises out of the construction of the San Francisco Federal Building. Since the complaint was filed, the parties have discussed how to resolve the issues between them arising out of the Project, and these discussions continue. On July 16, 2008, this Court entered a stipulated Order postponing the deadline for defendants' response to the complaint and all applicable case management dates by 60 days so that the parties could conduct a review and investigation. That SF #1563654 v1 -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 3:08-CV-01932 PJH Case 3:08-cv-02286-JL Document 9 Filed 09/23/2008 Page 2 of 3 Case 3:08-cv-02286-JL Document 9 Filed 09/23/2008 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SF #1563654 v1 ORDER The Court, having reviewed the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing for the time extensions reflected therein, hereby approves the revisions to the case management deadlines and sets the initial case management conference (previously scheduled for October 8, 2008) for 10:30 a.m. ____________________, 2008 in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco at _______________. December 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 29, , 2008 ____________________________________ James Larson Chief Magistrate Judge -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 3:08-CV-01932 PJH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?