Cotterill v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 105

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/24/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2009) Modified on 2/24/2009 (jjo, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHERYL COTTERILL, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL., Defendants. / ORDER SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS No. C 08-02295 JSW United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This matter is set for a hearing on April 3, 2009 on the City Defendants' motion to dismiss. The Court has received another motion to dismiss filed by the Regents Defendants and set for hearing on May 1, 2009. The Court HEREBY ORDERS that an opposition to the Regents' motion shall be filed by no later than March 10, 2009 and a reply brief shall be filed by no later than March 17, 1009. The Court further ORDERS that the hearing on the City Defendants' motion to dismiss is CONTINUED to May 1, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. to be heard in conjunction with the Regents' motion. The Court has already set a briefing schedule on the City Defendants' motion to dismiss which shall remain unchanged. /// /// /// /// /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 If the Court determines that these matters are suitable for resolution without oral argument, it will so advise the parties in advance of the hearing date. If the parties wish to modify this schedule, they may submit for the Court's consideration a stipulation and proposed order demonstrating good cause for any modification requested. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 24, 2009 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?