Cotterill v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 38

ORDER GRANTING 37 Stipulation Extending Deadline to Complete Mediation. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on September 5, 2008. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2008)

Download PDF
Case 3:08-cv-02295-JSW Document 37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961 Chief Trial Deputy SCOTT D. WIENER, State Bar #189266 Deputy City Attorney 1390 Market Street, 7th Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-4283 Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, GAVIN NEWSOM, MITCHELL KATZ, HEATHER FONG, MATTHEW MASON, HUGH HALL, GREGORY HICKS, LEON LOEW, JOHN CRUDO, AND PAUL DAVIES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHERYL COTTERILL, Plaintiff, vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, MATHEW MASON, HUGH HALL, GREGORY HICKS, LEON LOEW, HEATHER FONG, MITCHELL KATZ, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, PAUL DAVIES, GAVIN NEWSOM, JOHN CRUDO, ANNE BRAUN, ESTER CHOO, TRUDY SINGZON, JESSICA FOGLER, REGINA GRAHAM, TAMAR SEIVER, FREDERICK HUANG, HURBERT OCHITILL, RICK PATEL, ALICIA F. LIEBERMAN, MARK LEARY, ROBERT OKIN, ROBERT DYNES AND DOES 1 TO 30, Defendants. Case No. CV-08-02295 JSW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE MEDIATION STIPULATION RE MEDIATION DEADLINE; Cotterill v. CCSF, et al. ­ USDC No. CV-08-02295 JSW n:\lit\li2008\081193\00506686.doc Case 3:08-cv-02295-JSW Document 37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS the Court, on August 6, 2008, ordered this case to mediation, the deadline to complete that mediation falling on or about November 5, 2008; WHEREAS the Court subsequently continued the case management conference in this matter to October 10, 2008; WHEREAS the parties believe that they will not be in a position to mediate this case effectively by November; AND WHEREAS the parties want to ensure that they have completed sufficient discovery to be in a position to mediate the case meaningfully; THEREFORE the parties agree and stipulate, subject to the Court's approval, to continue the deadline to complete mediation to January 19, 2009. Dated: September 4, 2008 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER Chief Trial Deputy SCOTT D. WIENER Deputy City Attorney -/s/By: SCOTT D. WIENER Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, GAVIN NEWSOM, MITCHELL KATZ, HEATHER FONG, MATTHEW MASON, HUGH HALL, GREGORY HICKS, LEON LOEW, JOHN CRUDO, AND PAUL DAVIES Scott D. Wiener STIPULATION RE MEDIATION DEADLINE; Cotterill v. CCSF, et al. ­ USDC No. CV-08-02295 JSW 1 n:\lit\li2008\081193\00506686.doc Case 3:08-cv-02295-JSW Document 37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 4, 2008 GREGORY M. HAYNES, ESQ. -/s/By: GREGORY M. HAYNES Attorney for Plaintiff CHERYL COTTERILL *Pursuant to GO 45, the electronic signatory has obtained approval from this signatory. Dated: September 3, 2008 HASSARD BONNINGTON LLP -/s/By: R. WESLEY PRATT Attorneys for Defendants THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, ESTER CHOO, TRUDY SINGZON, JESSICA FOGLER, REGINA GRAHAM, TAMAR SEIVER, FREDERICK HUANG, HURBERT OCHITILL, RICK PATEL, ALICIA F. LIEBERMAN, MARK LEARY, ROBERT OKIN, AND ROBERT DYNES R. Wesley Pratt Gregory M. Haynes ORDER Based on the foregoing stipulation, the Court hereby orders that the deadline to complete the mediation of this case be extended to January 19, 2009. September 5, 2008 Dated: ___________________ _____________________________________ HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE STIPULATION RE MEDIATION DEADLINE; Cotterill v. CCSF, et al. ­ USDC No. CV-08-02295 JSW 2 n:\lit\li2008\081193\00506686.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?