Gremp v. Little et al

Filing 116

ORDER SETTING MOTIONS FOR HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2009 AT 9:00 A.M. The Motions for Summary Judgment filed by both sides will be heard on September 11, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. Neither motion will be heard on September 18, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 18, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of California TOM BLAKE Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 51885 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for State Defendants Patrick Taylor and Glenn Van Schaack IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

LARY W. GREMP,

CV 08 2303 MMC Plaintiff, MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF RE DISCOVERY [Civil Local Rules 7-11, 16-1]; [Proposed] ORDER SETTING MOTIONS FOR HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2009 AT 9:00 A.M. Date: September 11, 2009 Time: 10:00 a.m. Defendants. Dept: Courtroom 8, 19th Floor Judge The Hon. Maxine M. Chesney Trial Date November 9, 2009 Action Filed: May 2, 2008

v. SARAH LITTLE, et al.,

COME NOW the State Defendants, Patrick Taylor and Glenn Van Schaack, and respectfully request that the court enter an Order continuing for one week the motion for summary judgment that is now filed contemporaneously with this motion. The State Defendants are noticing their motion for summary judgment with a hearing date of September 11, 2009, pursuant to the Court's Pretrial Preparation Order of December 22, 2008 (Docket No. 63). The moving parties note that the order requires that the hearing be noticed for 35 days from date of filing and have complied with the order. However, the counsel for State Defendants is required to

27 28 appear at that same date and time in the matter of Parker v. Nishiyama, Case No. C-08-4750-CRB 1
Admin. Motion to Continue Hearing; P&A's; [Proposed] Order Case No. CV08 2303 MMC

1 2 3 4

(No. Dist. Calif.). The appearance in the Parker matter, a motion to dismiss, was previously set by counsel for co-defendants. Counsel have conferred concerning the dates. Plaintiff's counsel, Jordan Stanzler, agrees with the requested change. This change requires no alteration of the other dates.

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
Admin. Motion to Continue Hearing; P&A's; [Proposed] Order Case No. CV08 2303 MMC

POINTS AND AUTHORITIES THE COURT MAY MODIFY THE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE The Court has the authority to modify the Case Management schedule. Civil L.R. 16-2(d).

Respectfully Submitted, Dated: August 7, 2009 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of California

/s/ Tom Blake TOM BLAKE Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for State Defendants Patrick Taylor and Glenn Van Schaack

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3
Admin. Motion to Continue Hearing; P&A's; [Proposed] Order Case No. CV08 2303 MMC

[Proposed] ORDER The Motions for Summary Judgment filed by both sides will be heard on September 11 ______, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. 9:00 a.m. Neither motion will be heard on September 18, 2009.

18 Dated: August ____, 2009 ____________________________________ HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge