Gremp v. Little et al

Filing 95

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND REFERRING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES. To the extent the motion seeks a one-week extension of the deadline to complete discovery and a finding that plaintiff's previously-filed motion to compel w as timely filed, the motion is referred to Magistrate Judge James. To the extent the motion seeks an extension of the deadline to file dispositive motions, and a continuance of the status conference, pretrial conference, and trial dates, the motion is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 10, 2009 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge United States District Court LARY W. GREMP, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C 08-2303 MMC ORDER DENYING IN PART AND REFERRING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES /

SARAH LITTLE, et al., Defendants

Before the Court is plaintiff's "Motion to Extend Deadlines to Permit Discovery Motion to Be Adjudicated," filed July 7, 2009. To the extent the motion seeks a one-week extension of the deadline to complete discovery and a finding that plaintiff's previously-filed motion to compel, currently pending before the Honorable Maria-Elena James, was timely filed, the motion is hereby REFERRED to Magistrate Judge James. To the extent the motion seeks an extension of the deadline to file dispositive motions, and a continuance of the status conference, pretrial conference, and trial dates, the motion is hereby DENIED without prejudice, for the reason plaintiff fails to identify any specific need, let alone good cause, for such relief. The August 14, 2009 hearing before the undersigned is hereby VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED.