U-Haul Co. of California et al v. City of Berkeley
Filing
76
ORDER CONTINUING Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 2/21/2013. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/28/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 1/28/2013. (lblc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
Northern District of California
10
San Francisco Division
U-HAUL CO. OF CALIFORNIA et al.,
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
Plaintiffs,
v.
No. C 08-02313 LB
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
13
CITY OF BERKELEY,
[Re: ECF Nos. 74, 75]
14
15
Defendant.
_____________________________________/
16
This action has been stayed since September 3, 2008, pending the resolution of a parallel
17
action in California state court. Order Staying Case, ECF No. 33; see City of Berkeley v. U-Haul
18
Co. of California, et al., Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG08-388586. Prior to the
19
November 8, 2012 case management conference, Defendant’s counsel timely submitted a case
20
management statement, but Plaintiff’s counsel did not. Plaintiff’s counsel did not submit anything
21
until two days before the case management conference.
22
At the November 8, 2012 case management conference, the court set a further case
23
management conference for January 31, 2013. 11/8/2012 Minute Entry, ECF No. 73. Despite the
24
local rules requiring a joint case management statement, Defendant’s counsel had to submit her own
25
statement because Plaintiff’s counsel, like before the November 8, 2012 case management
26
conference, failed to respond at all to Defendant’s counsel’s communications.
27
Because of the court’s unavailability, the court CONTINUES the January 31, 2013 case
28
management conference to February 28, 2013 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, United
C 08-02313 LB
ORDER
1
States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. The parties SHALL file
2
a joint case management statement no later than February 21, 2013. In light of the prior failures
3
to communicate, Plaintiff’s counsel is warned that his failure to respond to Defendant’s counsel’s
4
communications—and thus to participate in this litigation—may be grounds for being sanctioned.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 28, 2013
_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C 08-02313 LB
ORDER
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?