Brown v. Stroud et al
Filing
215
ORDER (vrwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2010).
<![CDATA[
Brown v. Stroud et al
Doc. 215
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 STEVEN AMES BROWN, United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 Plaintiff, v No C 08-2348 VRW ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13 ANDREW B STROUD, an individual and dba STROUD PRODUCTIONS AND 14 ENTERPRISES, INC 15 16 17 Defendants. / The court is in receipt of plaintiff's application for an
18 order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed on defendant 19 Andrew Stroud and his counsel, Michele M Desoer. Doc #207. Stroud
20 and Desoer may file a ten-page response to plaintiff's application 21 on or before October 28, 2010. Any response, however, should be
22 limited to issues not raised in defendant's memorandum in opposition 23 to plaintiff's previous motion for sanctions, Doc #212. Plaintiff's
24 application, Doc #207, will be addressed further at the hearing 25 previously scheduled for November 4, 2010. 26 27 28 VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge IT IS SO ORDERED
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
© 2024 Justia
