Brown v. Stroud et al
Filing
324
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/6/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
STEVEN AMES BROWN,
12
No. C 08-02348 JSW
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
ORDER DISCHARGING TO
SHOW CAUSE
v.
ANDREW B. STROUD, and STROUD
PRODUCTIONS AND ENTERPRISES, INC.,
13
Defendants/Counterclaimants
14
v.
15
16
STEVEN AMES BROWN and ESTATE OF
NINA SIMONE,
17
Counterdefendants.
/
18
19
The Court has received the response to the order to show cause filed Counterclaimant
20
Andrew Stroud and Stroud Productions and Enterprises, Inc. and Andy Stroud, Inc.’s
21
(collectively, “Stroud”). Although the Court does not condone Stroud’s delay in responding the
22
motion to dismiss, the Court shall consider Stroud’s opposition and address this matter on the
23
merits. Therefore the Court will provide Steven Ames Brown (“Brown”) and the Estate of Nina
24
Simone (“Estate”) until September 20, 2011 to file a reply in support of their motion to dismiss.
25
The order to show cause dated July 19, 2011 is HEREBY DISCHARGED. However, Stroud is
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
admonished that the Court will sanction any further delays or violations of the Court’s order or
2
Local Rules.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: September 6, 2011
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?