Brown v. Stroud et al
Filing
472
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu re 471 Discovery Letter Brief.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
STEVEN AMES BROWN,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Plaintiff,
No. C 08-02348 JSW (DMR)
ORDER RE OCTOBER 5, 2012
DISCOVERY LETTER
v.
13
ANDREW B. STROUD, et al.,
14
Defendants.
___________________________________/
15
16
On June 30 and July 19, 2012, Plaintiffs/Counter-defendants Steven Ames Brown and the
17
Estate of Nina Simone (“the Estate”), along with Counter-defendant Sony Music Holdings, Inc.
18
(“Sony”), filed two discovery letter briefs against Defendant/Counter-claimant Andrew B. Stroud.
19
[Docket Nos. 442 and 449]. On July 30, 2012, the court denied both discovery motions without
20
prejudice until the parties clarified who would stand in Mr. Stroud’s stead in this litigation. The
21
court did not grant the parties permission to “renew” the joint discovery letters upon a successor to
22
Mr. Stroud being joined. [Docket No. 450.]
23
On October 4, 2012, Judge White granted the motion of Brown and the Estate to substitute
24
Scarlett Stroud for Andrew B. Stroud. [Docket No. 470.] On October 5, 2012, Brown, the Estate,
25
and Sony filed a letter purporting to renew the June 30 and July 19 discovery letter briefs and
26
requesting the court grant the renewed motions. [Docket No. 471.] The request is denied. The
27
parties are ordered to comply with the court’s Standing Order regarding discovery and to meet and
28
1
confer with Scarlett Stroud regarding the discovery disputes. If disagreements remain after meeting
2
and conferring, the parties may file a joint discovery letter.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: October 10, 2012
7
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?