Brown v. Stroud et al

Filing 483

ORDER REGARDING (1) MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL; (2) REFERRAL OF DISCOVERY; AND (3) CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 11/30/2012. Case Management Conference set for 12/7/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 10/31/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

STEVEN AMES BROWN, et al.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

No. C 08-02348 JSW

Plaintiffs,

No. C 09-03796 JSW

v.

No. C 11-05822 JSW

ANDREW B. STROUD, et al.,

13

Defendants

14

/

15
ANDREW B. STROUD, et al.,
16
Plaintiffs,
17
v.
18
CASTLE ROCK ENTERTAINMENT, et al.,
19
Defendants
/

20
21
LISA SIMONE KELLY,
22
Plaintiff,
23
v.
24
WALLY ROKER, et al.,
25
Defendants
26
27
28

/

ORDER REGARDING (1)
MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS
COUNSEL, (2) REFERRAL OF
DISCOVERY, AND (3)
CONTINUANCE OF CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1

Now before the Court is the motion to withdraw as counsel for Scarlett Stroud as

2

representative of the estate of Andrew B. Stroud,1 Andy Stroud, Inc. and Stroud Productions

3

and Enterprises, Inc. filed by Methen & Associates. No objections have been filed, although

4

Steven Ames Brown and the Estate of Nina Simone filed a document requesting that some

5

conditions be imposed on the withdrawal.

6

The Court HEREBY GRANTS the motion to withdraw. However, this withdrawal does

7

not relieve Methven & Associates from any sanctions imposed upon it. Moreover, as discussed

8

below, the grant of this motion is conditioned upon continued receipt of service.

thus, cannot represent themselves. See Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194,

11
For the Northern District of California

Andy Stroud, Inc. and Stroud Productions and Enterprises, Inc. are corporations and,

10

United States District Court

9

201-02 (1993); Civil Local Rule 3-9(b). Neither Andy Stroud, Inc. nor Stroud Productions and

12

Enterprises, Inc. have filed substitutions of counsel, despite having notice of the motion to

13

withdraw. Therefore, the Court HEREBY ORDERS Andy Stroud, Inc. and Stroud Productions

14

and Enterprises, Inc. TO SHOW CAUSE (“OSC”) as to whether they intend to find alternate

15

counsel and, if not, why judgement should not be entered against them on the claims against

16

them and why their affirmative claims should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Andy

17

Stroud, Inc. and Stroud Productions and Enterprises, Inc. shall respond in writing to this OSC

18

by no later than November 21, 2012. If Andy Stroud, Inc. and Stroud Productions and

19

Enterprises, Inc. need more time to find an attorney to provide a response to this OSC, the Court

20

will consider such a request. Methven & Associates shall serve this Order on Andy Stroud, Inc.

21

and Stroud Productions and Enterprises, Inc. and file a proof of such service by no later than

22

November 2, 2012.

23

Where, as here, withdrawal by an attorney from an action is not accompanied by

24

simultaneous appearance of substitute counsel, leave to withdraw may be subject to the

25
26
27
28

1
Methven & Associates actually moved to withdraw as counsel for Andrew B.
Stroud. However, since the motion to withdraw was filed, Andrew B. Stroud passed away
and the Court substituted in Scarlett Stroud as the representative for the estate of Andrew B.
Stroud.

2

1

condition that papers continue to be served on counsel unless and until the client appears by

2

other counsel. See Civ. L.R. 11-5(b) (stating that when withdrawal by an attorney from an

3

action is not accompanied by simultaneous appearance of substitute counsel . . . leave to

4

withdraw may be subject to the condition that papers may continue to be served on counsel for

5

forwarding purposes, unless and until the client appears by other counsel). Therefore, the Court

6

the grants of Methven & Associates’s motion to withdraw upon the condition that Methven &

7

Associates continue to receive service of all documents for Andy Stroud, Inc. and Stroud

8

Productions and Enterprises, Inc. in this action until substitute counsel makes an appearance or

9

until Andy Stroud, Inc. and Stroud Productions and Enterprises, Inc. are terminated as parties

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

from this action.
With respect to Scarlett Stroud, it is not yet clear whether she may proceed pro se or

12

must retain counsel in order to appear on behalf of the estate of Andrew B. Stroud. An attorney

13

must represent a personal representative of an estate where the estate has multiple beneficiaries

14

and creditors. See Simon v. Harford Life, Inc., 546 F.3d 661, 664 (9th Cir.2008) (“... courts

15

have routinely adhered to the general rule prohibiting pro se plaintiffs from pursuing claims on

16

behalf of others in a representative capacity.”); Pridgen v. Andresen, 113 F.3d 391, 393 (2nd

17

Cir. 1997); Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 499 (1975) (a claimant “must assert his own legal

18

rights and interests, and cannot rest his claim to relief on the legal rights or interests of third

19

parties.”) (quotation omitted); see also C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States, 818 F.2d 696,

20

697-98 (9th Cir. 1987) (trustee attempting to represent a trust pro se was not, pursuant to 28

21

U.S.C. § 1654, a “party” conducting his “own case personally” as he was not the beneficial

22

owner of the claims being asserted).

23

Scarlett Stroud is Ordered to Show Cause (“OSC”) in writing whether she intends to

24

appear pro se or through new counsel. If she intends to proceed pro se, she must demonstrate

25

that she is the sole beneficiary to the estate of Andrew Stroud and that there are no other

26

beneficiaries or creditors. Ms. Stroud shall provide this statement, and supporting evidence, by

27
28
3

1

no later than November 21, 2012.2 If she intends to obtain new counsel, she shall state by when

2

such counsel will make an appearance on behalf of the estate. Moreover, if she intends to

3

obtain new counsel, and such counsel does not file an appearance by November 21, 2012, Ms.

4

Stroud shall demonstrate good cause for any delay beyond this date. Ms. Stroud is admonished

5

that her failure to timely respond to this OSC, and obtain new counsel if necessary, will result in

6

dismissal of the estate’s affirmative claims for failure to prosecute and judgment being entered

7

against the estate on the claims against it.

8
9

Pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rule 11-5(b), Methven & Associates’s
withdrawal is conditioned upon Methven & Associates continued receipt service of all
documents in this action for the estate of Andrew B. Stroud until substitute counsel makes an

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

appearance or Scarlett Stroud demonstrates that she is authorized, and elects, to proceed pro se,

12

or until the estate of Andrew B. Stroud is terminated as a party from this action.

13

The Court further notes that Steven Ames Brown filed a declaration stating that the

14

estate has not yet paid the sanctions imposed against it. However, because Ms. Stroud and the

15

estate has been represented by Methven & Associates until the date of this Order, and Methven

16

& Associates has had difficulty communicating with Ms. Stroud, it is not clear whether Ms.

17

Stroud received notice of this deadline to pay the sanctions. The Court hereby orders Ms.

18

Stroud to pay the sanctions imposed against Andrew B. Stroud by no later than November 21,

19

2012. Ms. Stroud is admonished that her failure to comply with this order may result in further

20

sanctions being imposed, including an order of contempt.

21
22
23

Methven & Associates shall serve this Order on Scarlett Stroud and file a proof of such
service by no later than November 2, 2012.
The Court HEREBY ADVISES Ms. Stroud that a Handbook for Pro Se Litigants, which

24

contains helpful information about proceeding without an attorney, is available through the

25

Court’s website or in the Clerk’s office. Ms. Stroud also may wish to seek assistance from the

26
27
28

2
If Ms. Stroud is authorized, and elects, to proceed pro se, parties are advised that
this matter will not be excluded from the e-filing program, but that they are required to serve
paper copies by mail on all unrepresented parties. Scarlett Stroud, so long as she remains
unrepresented, shall file and serve all submissions to the Court in paper form unless prior
leave of Court is obtained.

4

1

Legal Help Center, and can do so by calling the Legal Help Center at 415-782-9000, extension

2

8657, or by signing up on the 15th Floor of the Courthouse, Room 2796, for a free appointment

3

with an attorney who may be able to provide basic legal help, but not legal representation.

4

The Court FURTHER ORDERS that pursuant to Local Rule 72-1, all discovery disputes

5

in Kelly v. Roker, Case No. 11-5822, are HEREBY REFERRED to Magistrate Donna M. Ryu,

6

along with the other above-captioned related cases. Additionally, the case management

7

conference scheduled for November 9, 2012 is CONTINUED to December 7, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.

8

Counsel for the estate of Nina Simone, Dorothy Weber, may appear by telephone, provided that

9

she file a document with a direct land line number at which she will be available for the case

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

management conference by no later than November 30, 2012.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13

Dated: October 31, 2011
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
cc: Magistrate Referral Clerk
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5