Brown v. Stroud et al

Filing 513

ORDER re (512 in 3:08-cv-02348-JSW) Letter filed by Steven Ames Brown. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 02/28/2013. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 STEVEN AMES BROWN, 12 13 Plaintiff, v. No. C-08-02348 JSW (DMR) No. C-11-05822 JSW (DMR) ORDER RE FEBRUARY 22, 2013 DISCOVERY LETTER 14 ANDREW B. STROUD, et al., 15 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 16 LISA SIMONE KELLY, 17 Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 WALLY ROKER, et al., 20 21 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 22 23 The court has reviewed the February 22, 2013 joint discovery letter submitted by Plaintiffs 24 Steven Ames Brown and the Estate of Nina Simone and third-party The Orchard Enterprises 25 (“Orchard”) regarding their dispute about a subpoena served on Orchard by Plaintiff Brown. 26 [Docket No. 512.] It is unclear from the joint letter whether Orchard actually has any responsive 27 documents and/or recordings in its possession, custody or control. If it does not, the present 28 discovery dispute may be moot. Therefore, the court orders Orchard to submit a sworn declaration 1 to the court regarding whether it has any documents and/or recordings responsive to the subpoena in 2 its possession, custody or control, regardless of its stated objections. Such declaration shall be filed 3 by no later than March 8, 2013. Dated: February 28, 2013 NO . Ryu 8 9 United States Magistrate Judge RT M o DONNAudgRYU nna J M. e D 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court ER 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 A H 10 R NIA 7 DERED O OR IT IS S FO 6 LI IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 5 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 4 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?