Brown v. Stroud et al

Filing 572

ORDER RE: FURTHER BRIEFING. By 6/28/13, each party moving for default judgment must file a brief, not exceeding ten pages, addressing jurisdictional issue. Any opposition must be filed by 7/10/13. No reply brief may be filed without leave of Court. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/14/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 STEVEN AMES BROWN, et al., Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 v. ORDER RE: FURTHER BRIEFING ANDREW B. STROUD, et al., Defendants 16 17 ANDREW B. STROUD, et al., 18 19 Plaintiffs, v. 20 CASTLE ROCK ENTERTAINMENT, et al., 21 Defendants 22 23 24 LISA SIMONE KELLY, Plaintiff, v. 25 WALLY ROKER, et al., 26 No. 08-cv-02348 JSW (NC) No. 09-cv-03796 JSW (NC) No. 11-cv-05822 JSW (NC) Defendants 27 28 Case No. 08-cv-02348 JSW (NC), Case No. 09-cv-03796 JSW (NC), Case No. 11-cv-05822 JSW (NC) ORDER RE: FURTHER BRIEFING 1 Th hese cases were referre to this Court for a re w ed eport and re ecommenda ation on the e t f st Stroud as th representative for the he 2 motions for default judgment filed agains Scarlett S c. B state, Andy Stroud, Inc and Strou Producti y ud ions and 3 Estate of Andrew B. Stroud Es ises, Inc. (co ollectively, “Stroud”). The next d after th referral, S day he Stroud filed an d 4 Enterpri o h e s. o. JSW 5 appeal to the Ninth Circuit in each of the three cases (Dkt. No 567 in 08-cv-02348 J D 3 03796 JSW (NC); and Dkt. No. 17 in 11-cv 71 v-05822 JSW W 6 (NC); Dkt. No. 123 in 09-cv-0 T tates that it is appealin the order of the D ng r(s) District Cou urt, 7 (NC)). The notice of appeal st ses denying Str roud’s Moti ions for reco onsideration of n 8 entered in these cas on May 8, 2013, “d rict s stituting the Executrix for the Esta of ABS along with any e ate h 9 the Distr Court’s order subs uent ) or udgment file against S ed Stroud” in t these 10 subsequ order(s) regarding motions fo default ju 0 as uence of the denial of Stroud’s M otions for r e S reconsiderat tion.” Id. 11 cases “a a consequ 1 12 2 In a subseque stipulati to continue the cas settlemen conferenc Sony M n ent ion se nt ce, Music nment, the Estate of Nina Simone and Steve Ames Br N e, en rown noted that there i an d is 13 Entertain 3 ved s r n ppeal dives the Distric Court of st ct f 14 unresolv issue as to whether Stroud’s notices of ap 4 tion 5 v-02348 JSW (NC); D No. 125 in W Dkt. 5 15 jurisdict over these cases. (Dkt. No. 570 in 08-cv 5 3796 JSW (NC); and Dkt. No. 17 in 11-cv( D 74 -05822 JSW (NC)). A letter subm W mitted 16 09-cv-03 6 equests a tel lephone con nference to discuss the jurisdiction issue. D No. 57 By e nal Dkt. 71. 17 today re 7 , h ving fault judgme must fil a brief, n exceedin ten ent le not ng 18 June 28, 2013, each party mov for def 8 a his n. ties ouraged to file a joint brief to the extent 19 pages, addressing th question The part are enco 9 e. osition, also not to exc o ceed ten pag must be filed by Ju 10, 2013. No ges, e uly 20 possible Any oppo 0 ief ut 21 reply bri may be filed withou leave of Court. 1 22 2 IT IS SO OR T RDERED. 23 3 Date: June 14 2013 4, 24 4 ____ __________ __________ _____ Nath hanael M. C Cousins Unit States M ted Magistrate J Judge 25 5 26 6 27 7 28 Case No. 08-cv-0234 JSW (NC 8 48 C), Case No. 09-cv-0379 JSW (NC 96 C), Case No. 11-cv-0582 JSW (NC 22 C) ORDER RE: FURTH R HER BRIEF FING 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?