Brown v. Stroud et al

Filing 572

ORDER RE: FURTHER BRIEFING. By 6/28/13, each party moving for default judgment must file a brief, not exceeding ten pages, addressing jurisdictional issue. Any opposition must be filed by 7/10/13. No reply brief may be filed without leave of Court. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/14/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12

STEVEN AMES BROWN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

13
14
15

v.

ORDER RE: FURTHER
BRIEFING

ANDREW B. STROUD, et al.,
Defendants

16

17 ANDREW B. STROUD, et al.,
18
19

Plaintiffs,
v.

20 CASTLE ROCK ENTERTAINMENT, et al.,
21

Defendants

22
23
24

LISA SIMONE KELLY,
Plaintiff,
v.

25 WALLY ROKER, et al.,
26

No. 08-cv-02348 JSW (NC)
No. 09-cv-03796 JSW (NC)
No. 11-cv-05822 JSW (NC)

Defendants

27
28 Case No. 08-cv-02348 JSW (NC),

Case No. 09-cv-03796 JSW (NC),
Case No. 11-cv-05822 JSW (NC)
ORDER RE: FURTHER BRIEFING

1

Th
hese cases were referre to this Court for a re
w
ed
eport and re
ecommenda
ation on the
e

t
f
st
Stroud as th representative for the
he
2 motions for default judgment filed agains Scarlett S
c.
B
state, Andy Stroud, Inc and Strou Producti
y
ud
ions and
3 Estate of Andrew B. Stroud Es
ises, Inc. (co
ollectively, “Stroud”). The next d after th referral, S
day
he
Stroud filed an
d
4 Enterpri
o
h
e
s.
o.
JSW
5 appeal to the Ninth Circuit in each of the three cases (Dkt. No 567 in 08-cv-02348 J
D
3
03796 JSW (NC); and Dkt. No. 17 in 11-cv
71
v-05822 JSW
W
6 (NC); Dkt. No. 123 in 09-cv-0
T
tates that it is appealin the order of the D
ng
r(s)
District Cou
urt,
7 (NC)). The notice of appeal st
ses
denying Str
roud’s Moti
ions for reco
onsideration of
n
8 entered in these cas on May 8, 2013, “d
rict
s
stituting the Executrix for the Esta of ABS along with any
e
ate
h
9 the Distr Court’s order subs
uent
)
or
udgment file against S
ed
Stroud” in t
these
10 subsequ order(s) regarding motions fo default ju
0
as
uence of the denial of Stroud’s M otions for r
e
S
reconsiderat
tion.” Id.
11 cases “a a consequ
1

12
2

In a subseque stipulati to continue the cas settlemen conferenc Sony M
n
ent
ion
se
nt
ce,
Music

nment, the Estate of Nina Simone and Steve Ames Br
N
e,
en
rown noted that there i an
d
is
13 Entertain
3
ved
s
r
n
ppeal dives the Distric Court of
st
ct
f
14 unresolv issue as to whether Stroud’s notices of ap
4
tion
5
v-02348 JSW (NC); D No. 125 in
W
Dkt.
5
15 jurisdict over these cases. (Dkt. No. 570 in 08-cv
5
3796 JSW (NC); and Dkt. No. 17 in 11-cv(
D
74
-05822 JSW (NC)). A letter subm
W
mitted
16 09-cv-03
6
equests a tel
lephone con
nference to discuss the jurisdiction issue. D No. 57 By
e
nal
Dkt.
71.
17 today re
7
,
h
ving
fault judgme must fil a brief, n exceedin ten
ent
le
not
ng
18 June 28, 2013, each party mov for def
8
a
his
n.
ties
ouraged to file a joint brief to the extent
19 pages, addressing th question The part are enco
9
e.
osition, also not to exc
o
ceed ten pag must be filed by Ju 10, 2013. No
ges,
e
uly
20 possible Any oppo
0
ief
ut
21 reply bri may be filed withou leave of Court.
1

22
2

IT IS SO OR
T
RDERED.

23
3

Date: June 14 2013
4,

24
4

____
__________
__________
_____
Nath
hanael M. C
Cousins
Unit States M
ted
Magistrate J
Judge

25
5
26
6
27
7
28 Case No. 08-cv-0234 JSW (NC
8
48
C),

Case No. 09-cv-0379 JSW (NC
96
C),
Case No. 11-cv-0582 JSW (NC
22
C)
ORDER RE: FURTH
R
HER BRIEF
FING

2