Callegari v. Lee et al

Filing 69

CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Mejias, Anthony Milanes, Charles D. Lee, D. Tyler, K. Brannon, Lovevasia Bey, Navneet Adya, R. Rodriguez, Randolph Gibbs, Reynal Cordero, Robert Bowman, Sid Rany against Carl Lee Callegari. Plaintiffs motion to compel is hereby DENIED. Defendants motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is hereby DENIED. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2011)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
CARL LEE CALLEGARI,
No. CV-08-2420 MMC (PR)

6
7

Plaintiff,
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

8

v.

9
CHARLES D. LEE, M.D., et al.,
10
Defendants.
/

11
12

() Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues
13

have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.
14

(X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The
15

issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.
16

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED
17

Plaintiff’s motion to compel is hereby DENIED.
18

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED.
19

Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is hereby DENIED.
20
21
22

Dated: December 1, 2011

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

23
24

By: Tracy Lucero
Deputy Clerk

25
26
27
28