Limo Hosting, Inc et al v. Fiks

Filing 62

STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 3/27/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Timothy J. Walton (State Bar No. 184292) LAW OFFICES OF TIMOTHY WALTON 801 Woodside Rd. Ste. 11 Redwood City, CA 94061 Phone: (650) 216-9800 Fax: (650) 618-8687 Email: cand.uscourts.gov@computercounsel.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs LIMO HOSTING, INC. and OLEG GRIDNEV UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION LIMO HOSTING, INC. et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) MIKHAIL FIKS et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) ) MIKHAIL FIKS, et al., ) ) Cross-Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) LIMO HOSTING, INC., et al., ) ) Cross-Defendants. ) Case No.: 3:08 CV 02474 BZ STIPULATION TO FILE AN AMENDED ANSWER TO DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIMS 1 STIPULATION TO FILE AN AMENDED ANSWER TO DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 For the purpose of settling and compromising a dispute over the content of CrossDefendants, Plaintiffs Limo Hosting, Inc. (hereinafter "Limo Hosting") and Oleg Gridnev and Defendant Mikhail Fiks hereby stipulate and agree that Cross-Defendants may file an amended answer with the following changes: 1. In answer to the paragraph 34 of Defendant's counterclaims: Cross-Defendant Oleg Gridnev admits the allegation in this Paragraph that he left a voicemail on CrossComplainant Fiks' answering machine but lacks information about the accuracy of CrossComplainant's transcription, and therefore denies that the voicemail is exactly as alleged. 2. In answer to the paragraph 39 of Defendant's counterclaims: Cross-Defendants deny all the allegations in this Paragraph, except admit that William Sharp filed a police report. Cross-Defendants dispute the accuracy of the police report. 3. In answer to the paragraph 40 of Defendant's counterclaims; Cross-Defendant Oleg Gridnev admits that he called Yogesh Kumar but denies that his message was harassing or threatening. 4. In answer to the paragraph 44 of Defendant's counterclaims: Cross-Defendant Oleg Gridnev admits that he published the statements mentioned in this Paragraph but denies the implication that he initiated the message posts at RipOffReport.com. 5. In answer to the paragraph 56 of Defendant's counterclaims: Cross-Defendant Oleg Gridnev admits that he registered the domain names alleged in this paragraph but denies that Cross-Complainant Fiks' FREE LIMO WEBSITE trademark had become distinctive or indicative of Cross-Complainant Fiks' services. 2 STIPULATION TO FILE AN AMENDED ANSWER TO DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 6. In answer to the paragraph 57 of Defendant's counterclaims: Cross-Defendants admit to creating web sites, but deny that such web sites are "nearly identical to those offered by Fiks's Free Limo Website." DATED this 26th day of March, 2009. Presented by /s/ Timothy J. Walton Timothy J. Walton Attorneys for Plaintiffs /s/ Margarita Calpotura Margarita Calpotura Attorneys for Defendant Upon review of the proposed changes to the answer to Cross-Complaint, and for good cause, this Court orders that Cross-Defendants LIMO HOSTING, INC, and OLEG GRIDNEV have ten days leave to file an Amended Answer. IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: 3/27/2009 UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA Judge of the Superior Court District ER N F D IS T IC T O R 3 STIPULATION TO FILE AN AMENDED ANSWER TO DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIMS A C LI FO Jud ard Zim ge Bern merman R NIA I ORD T IS SO ERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?