Sepatis v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR DEFENDANT'S 26 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Frederick Schiff, Sean Frost, City and County of San Francisco. Opposition due by 5/15/2009. Replies due by 5/22/2009. Motion Hearing prev. set for 5/22/9 at 9:30 AM has been re-set for 6/5/2009 at *01:30 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed, as modified, by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 4/23/9. *Note time change*(klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2009)

Download PDF
Case 3:08-cv-02497-JCS Document 30 Filed 04/22/2009 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 John Houston Scott (SBN 72578) Lizabeth N. de Vries (SBN 227215) Scott Law Firm 1375 Sutter Street, Suite 222 San Francisco, CA 94109 Tel: (415) 561-9600 Fax: (415) 561-9609 john@scottlawfirm.net liza@scottlawfirm.net Attorneys for Plaintiff, WILLIAM SEPATIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WILLIAM SEPATIS, Plaintiff, vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SEAN FROST, FREDERICK SCHIFF and DOES 1-25, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. C08-2497 JCS STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE Filed Date: Trial Date: May 16, 2008 not set Both parties, plaintiff William Sepatis and defendant City and County of San Francisco, hereby stipulate to modify the briefing schedule for defendants' motion for summary judgment in exchange for plaintiff William Sepatis' non-opposition to defendant's amending their motion for summary judgment, Document No.29 on the Court's docket. There is currently no trial date set in this case. There have been no other requests for time modification as to defendant's motion for summary judgment. Modification in the briefing schedule would enlarge all applicable dates by two weeks. So, the hearing for defendant's motion for summary judgment is moved from Friday, May 22, 2009 to STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 Case 3:08-cv-02497-JCS Document 30 Filed 04/22/2009 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1:30 PM- JCS Friday, June 5, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. Plaintiff's opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment is due on or before Friday, May 15, 2009. Defendant's reply, if any, to plaintiff's opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment is due on or before May 22, 2009. Neither party nor the court will be prejudiced by enlarging all applicable dates related to defendant's motion for summary judgment by two weeks. Dated: April 17, 2009 Respectfully submitted, SCOTT LAW FIRM By: /s/ John Houston Scott JOHN HOUSTON SCOTT Attorneys for Plaintiff WILLIAM SEPATIS Dated: April 17, 2009 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Meredith Osborn MEREDITH OSBORN Attorneys for Defendant City and County of San Francisco ISTRIC ES D TC AT T 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 23, 2009 UNIT ED S 18 ER N F D IS T IC T O R STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE 2 A C LI FO pero ph C. S dge Jose Ju R NIA D RDERE IS SO O FIED IT DI AS MO RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?