Ceravision, Limited v. Luxim Corporation

Filing 63

ORDER reopening case; setting 3/13/09 case management conference. Signed by Judge Illston on 2/11/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2009)

Case 3:08-cv-02575-SI

Document 62

Filed 02/05/2009

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

JAMES B. LEWIS, SBN 71669 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 1900 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2223 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650-849-4800 [e-mail] SAMANTHA STONEWORK, SBN 245788 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415-393-2286 [e-mail] R. DANNY HUNTINGTON (PRO HAC VICE) B. JEFFERSON BOGGS (PRO HAC VICE) SUSAN BAKER MANNING, SBN 197350 TIMOTHY A MOLINO (PRO HAC VICE) BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 2020 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006-1806 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 202-373-6001 [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff Ceravision, Limited

ROBERT C. MORGAN, SBN 46348 ROPES & GRAY LLP 1211 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 212-596-9090 [e-mail] TERRY KEARNEY, SBN 160054 MATTHEW A. ARGENTI, SBN 240954 CINDY C. LIOU, SBN 252161 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650-565-5100 [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant Luxim Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CERAVISION LIMITED, Plaintiff v. LUXIM CORPORATION, CASE NO.: C 08-02575 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT

22 23 Defendant. 24 25

Plaintiff Ceravision Limited and defendant Luxim Corporation jointly submit this 26 Stipulation and Proposed Order Vacating Order of Dismissal upon Settlement. 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT CASE NO.: C 08-02575 SI

Case 3:08-cv-02575-SI

Document 62

Filed 02/05/2009

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Pursuant to the Order of Dismissal upon Settlement entered by this Court on January 29, 2009 (Docket No. 61), this case was dismissed with prejudice following notification that the parties had agreed to settlement terms during their January 27, 2009 mediation session. In order to give the parties time to execute their settlement agreement and file it with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the parties stipulate and request the Court to vacate the Order of Dismissal upon Settlement. The parties will file a stipulation of dismissal with the Court after they have filed the settlement agreement with the USPTO.

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

By: /s/ R. Danny Huntington R. Danny Huntington Dated: February 5, 2009

By: /s/ Matthew A. Argenti Matthew A. Argenti Dated: February 5, 2009 Attorneys for Defendant Luxim Corporation

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 Dated: 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT CASE NO.: C 08-02575 SI

Attorneys for Plaintiff Ceravision Limited

The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge A further case management conference has been scheduled to occur on Friday, March 13, 2009, at 3 p.m.

-2-

Case 3:08-cv-02575-SI

Document 62

Filed 02/05/2009

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 Dated: February 5, 2009 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT CASE NO.: C 08-02575 SI

Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(b) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from R. Danny Huntington. WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI By: /s/ Matthew A. Argenti Matthew A. Argenti Attorneys for Defendant Luxim Corporation

-3-