Bondar v. Bank of America Corporation et al

Filing 104

ORDER RE: OCTOBER 2, 2009 HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/29/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE:BANK OF AMERICA CORP. AUCTION RATE SECURITIES (ARS) MARKETING LITIGATION, This document relates to: ALL CASES / Having received and considered the parties' Joint Case Management Conference Statement, it is HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Case Management Conference scheduled for Friday, October 2, 2009 at 9:00 MDL No. 09-02014 JSW ORDER RE OCTOBER 2, 2009 HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 a.m. is CONTINUED to Friday, January 15, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. A further Joint Case Management statement shall be due by no later than Friday, January 8, 2010. 2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Twin Lane's Complaint is DENIED AS MOOT, in light of the settlement. If the parties in the Twin Lane action have not filed a stipulation of dismissal by October 9, 2009, they shall file a status report setting forth the status of the settlement and when they expect a dismissal to be filed. 3. The pending motion to dismiss in the Independence Tube litigation remains on calendar on October 2, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. // // // // 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4. The parties in the Bondar litigation have noticed the hearing on the motion to dismiss for November 20, 2009. However, the Court is unavailable on that date. Accordingly, the parties shall renotice that motion for an open date on this Court's calendar after November 27, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 29, 2009 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?