Huq et al v. Sanyo North America Corporation et al

Filing 39

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 CHARLES GEERHART (SBN 139769) PAOLI & GEERHART, LLP 785 Market Street Suite 1150 San Francisco, CA 94103 (415) 498-2101 Attorneys for Plaintiffs FARHANA HUQ; JOSETTE MOLLOY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FARHANA HUQ; JOSETTE MOLLOY; CREATING ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN, INC. PLAINTIFFS, VS. SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION; LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.; INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION DEFENDANTS. Case No. C08 02614 SC (ADR) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL [FRCP 41] IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). Each party is to bear his/her/its own costs and fees. Date: January 26, 2010 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T PAOLI & GEERHART LLP UNIT ED 24 25 26 27 28 RT U O S /s/__________________________ Charles Geerhart Attorneys for Plaintiffs FARHANA HUQ; JOSETTE MOLLOY ER N F D IS T IC T O R Huq v. Sanyo et al USDC No. C 08 02614 SC (ADR) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL A C LI FO Judge S amuel C onti R NIA IT IS S OO D RDERE NO RT H 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Date: January 26, 2010 WILSON ELSER ET AL /s/__________________________ Mark Cokee Attorneys for Defendants SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION; LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.; INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION Huq v. Sanyo et al USDC No. C 08 02614 SC (ADR) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?