Huq et al v. Sanyo North America Corporation et al
Filing
39
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
CHARLES GEERHART (SBN 139769) PAOLI & GEERHART, LLP 785 Market Street Suite 1150 San Francisco, CA 94103 (415) 498-2101 Attorneys for Plaintiffs FARHANA HUQ; JOSETTE MOLLOY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FARHANA HUQ; JOSETTE MOLLOY; CREATING ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN, INC. PLAINTIFFS, VS. SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION; LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.; INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION DEFENDANTS.
Case No. C08 02614 SC (ADR) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL [FRCP 41]
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). Each party is to bear his/her/its own costs and fees. Date: January 26, 2010
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T
PAOLI & GEERHART LLP
UNIT ED
24 25 26 27 28
RT U O
S
/s/__________________________ Charles Geerhart Attorneys for Plaintiffs FARHANA HUQ; JOSETTE MOLLOY
ER
N
F D IS T IC T O R
Huq v. Sanyo et al USDC No. C 08 02614 SC (ADR) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
A
C
LI
FO
Judge S
amuel C
onti
R NIA
IT IS S
OO
D RDERE
NO
RT
H
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Date: January 26, 2010
WILSON ELSER ET AL
/s/__________________________ Mark Cokee Attorneys for Defendants SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION; LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.; INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Huq v. Sanyo et al USDC No. C 08 02614 SC (ADR) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?