Thames et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER Continuing Dates for Expert Disclosures (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CSBN 44332) United States Attorney JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143) Chief, Civil Division MICHAEL T. PYLE (CSBN 172954 ) Assistant United States Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office/Civil Division 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 9th Floor San Francisco, California 94102-3495 Telephone: (415) 436-7322 Facsimile: (415) 436-6748 E-mail: michael.t.pyle@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendant United States of America UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned that the deadline for 19 expert disclosures is continued to April 10, 2009 and the deadline for rebuttal expert disclosures 20 is continued to May 15, 2009. The undersigned submit this stipulation pursuant to Civil Local 21 Rule 6-1(a) and certify that the extension of these dates does not require changes to any deadlines 22 or dates set by the Court. These dates have not been continued prior to the filing of this 23 stipulation. 24 25 26 27 28 /// UNIT ED VALERIE THAMES et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 08-2617 SC STIPULATION CONTINUING DATES FOR EXPERT DISCLOSURES Civil L.R. 6-1(a) DATED: February 27, 2009 By: _____/s/________________________ J. NILEY DORIT Attorney for Plaintiff /// STIP. TO CONTINUE DATES C 0 8 - 2 6 1 7 SC S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI FO 1 Judge S amuel C onti R NIA IT IS S O ORD ERED RT U O NO RT H 1 2 3 DATED: February 27, 2009 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. TO CONTINUE DATES C 0 8 - 2 6 1 7 SC JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney By: _____/s/ _______________________ MICHAEL T. PYLE Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?