Board of Trustees of the San Mateo Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees Welfare Fund et al v. H. Young Enterprises, Inc. et al
Filing
21
ORDER re 18 Ex Parte Application for Order to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Board of Trustees of the San Mateo Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees Pension Fund, Sherri Chiesa, Board of Trustees of the San Mateo Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees Welfare Fund. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/14/08. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2008)
Case 3:08-cv-02619-EMC
Document 20
Filed 11/12/2008
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ERSKINE & TULLEY A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MICHAEL J. CARROLL (St. Bar #50246) 220 Montgomery Street, Suite 303 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 392-5431 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SAN MATEO ) HOTEL EMPLOYEES, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) H. YOUNG ENTERPRISES, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________
NO.
C 08 2619 EMC
ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
IT IS ORDERED that the Case Management Conference in this case set for November 19, 2008 be continued to January 28, 2009 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. Plaintiffs will file a Motion for Default
Judgment no later than December 12, 2008.
UNIT ED
____________________________ Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen
S
No____ r 14, 2008 Dated:_____vembe________
S DISTRICT TE C TA
ER
N
D IS T IC T R
OF
ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
A
C
LI
FO
dward Judge E
n M. Che
R NIA
O OR IT IS S
DERED
RT U O
NO
RT
H
Case 3:08-cv-02619-EMC
Document 20
Filed 11/12/2008
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?