Farhang v. Indian institute of Technology Kharagpur et al

Filing 669

ORDER granting 665 STIPULATION to extend deadlines re: 659 MOTION for Attorney Fees. Response due by 10/30/2019. Reply due by 11/13/2019. Motion Hearing set for 12/4/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/4/2019. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2019)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

NEEL CHATTERJEE (SBN 173985)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL T. JONES (SBN 290660)
[e-mail]
ELIZABETH J. LOW (SBN 308098)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
601 Marshall Street
Redwood City, California 94063
Tel.: [phone]
Fax.: [phone]
BRENDAN E. RADKE (SBN 275284)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel.: [phone]
Fax.: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
[ADDITIONAL COUNSEL LISTED
ON SIGNATURE PAGE]

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18
19
20
21
22

M.A. MOBILE LTD.,
Plaintiff,
v.
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
KHARAGPUR,
Defendant.

23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME
CASE NO. 08-CV-02658-WHO

Civil Action No. 08-cv-02658-WHO
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
CHANGING TIME;
ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff M.A. Mobile Ltd. (“M.A. Mobile”) and Defendant
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (“IIT”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
WHEREAS, on September 19, 2019, IIT filed its Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (the
“Fees Motion”) (Dkt. No. 659);
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2019, the Court continued the hearing on the Fees Motion
from October 30, 2019 to November 6, 2019 (Dkt. No. 664);

7

WHEREAS, counsel for IIT is unavailable on November 6, 2019;

8

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and agreed to the following briefing and

9

hearing schedule:

10

1.

M.A. Mobile shall file its opposition no later than October 30, 2019;

11

2.

IIT shall file its reply no later than November 13, 2019; and

12

3.

Subject to the Court’s availability, a hearing on the Fees Motion shall take

13
14
15

place on December 4, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.
Accordingly, the parties submit that good cause exists for further amendment to the pre-trial
schedule and respectfully request that the Court grant this stipulation.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME
CASE NO. 08-CV-02658-WHO

1

1
2

Dated: September 30, 2019

Respectfully submitted,

3

M.A. Mobile Ltd.

Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

/s/ Sanjiv N. Singh
Sanjiv N. Singh, Esq.
SANJIV N. SINGH, A PROFESSIONAL
LAW CORPORATION
1650 South Amphlett Blvd. Suite 220
San Mateo, CA 94402
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

/s/ Neel Chatterjee
Neel Chatterjee
[e-mail]
Michael T. Jones
[e-mail]
Elizabeth J. Low
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
601 Marshall Street
Redwood City, CA 94063
Tel.: [phone]
Fax.: [phone]

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Micah R. Jacobs, Esq.
JACOBS LAW GROUP SF
388 Market Street Suite 1300
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

13
14

BRENDAN E. RADKE (SBN 275284)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel.: [phone]
Fax.: [phone]

15
16
17
18
19

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO

20

ORDERED.

21

4th
October
DATED this ____ day of _________________, 2019.

22
23

HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME
CASE NO. 08-CV-02658-WHO

2

1
2
3

CIVIL L.R. 5-1 ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories.

4
5

/s/ Neel Chatterjee
Neel Chatterjee

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME
CASE NO. 08-CV-02658-WHO

3