George et al v. Sonoma County Sherrif's Department et al
Filing
202
STIPULATION AND ORDER [AS MODIFIED] CONTINUING Further Case Management Conference to 11/17/2009 10:00 AM re #201 . Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 8/24/09. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Thomas Marc Litton (SBN 119985) tlitton@nydclaw.com Sanford Wittels & Heisler, LLP 100 Montgomery Street, Suite 1600 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 421-4774 Facsimile: (415) 421-4784 Steven L. Wittels (N.Y. SBN 2004635) swittels@nydclaw.com Sanford Wittels & Heisler, LLP 1350 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 3100 New York, N.Y. 10019 Telephone: (646) 723-2947 Facsimile: (646) 723-2948 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
VALERIE GEORGE, as Administrator and Personal Representative of THE ESTATE OF RYAN GEORGE; VALERIE GEORGE and TAJMAH BEAUCHAMP, as Legal Representatives for Jaida George and Ryan George, Jr.; VALERIE GEORGE, Individually; DONALD GEORGE; and TAJMAH BEAUCHAMP, Individually, Plaintiffs, vs. SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; BILL COGBILL; COUNTY OF SONOMA; CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, INC.; JAMES LUDERS, M.D.; MICHAEL E. DAGEY, R.N.; SUTTER HEALTH; SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER OF SANTA ROSA; EDWARD W. HARD, M.D.; RICHARD FLINDERS, M.D.; JOSEPH N. MATEL, M.D.; NORICK JANIAN, M.D.; ANGUS MATHESON, M.D.; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants.
Case No.: 3:08-cv-02675-EDL
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON AS MODIFIED
Date: August 25, 2009 Time: 10:00 a.m. Ctrm: E, 15th Floor Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte
STIPULATION CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE HEARING The parties and their respective counsel having conferred hereby stipulate and agree that in the interest of judicial economy the case management conference hearing, presently set for August
1 Stipulation Re:CMC and [Proposed] Order 3:08-cv-02675-EDL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
25, 2009, should be continued in order that the parties can continue to confer upon the selection of a mediator and a mediation hearing date before appearing before the court. The parties respectfully request that the court continue the case management conference to November 10, 2009 at 10:00am. DATED: August 18, 2009 SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs /S/ Steven L. Wittels
By:
DATED: August 18, 2009
SPAULDING McCULLOUGH & TANSIL LLP Attorneys for Defendants SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, BILL COGBILL and COUNTY OF SONOMA /S/ Terry S. Sterling
By:
DATED: August 18, 2009
TRIMBLE, SHERINIAN & VARANINI Attorneys for Defendants CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, INC., JAMES LUDERS, M.D. and MICHAEL DAGEY, R.N /S/ Jerome M. Varanini
By:
DATED: August 18, 2009
HASSARD BONNINGTON Attorneys for Defendants JOSEPH R. MATEL, M.D. and RICHARD FLINDERS, M.D. /S/ Marc N. Zimmerman
By:
2 Stipulation Re:CMC and [Proposed] Order 3:08-cv-02675-EDL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DATED: August 18, 2009
LA FOLLETTE, JOHNSON, DE HAAS, FESLER & AMES Attorneys for Defendants SUTTER HEALTH and SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER OF SANTA ROSA /S/ Barry Vogel
By:
DATED: August 18, 2009
ROGASKI, PREOVOLOS, WEBER & PATTERSON, LLP Attorneys for Defendant NORICK JANIAN, M.D /S/ Chester A. Rogaski
By:
DATED: August 18, 2009
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH, LLP Attorneys for Defendant EDWARD W. HARD, M.D /S/ Carol Sleeth
By:
[PROPOSED] ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING to the satisfaction of the court, the case management 17 conference hearing set for August 25, 2009 is hereby continued to November 10, 2009 at 10:00 am in Ctrm: E, 15th Floor.
IC ES _________________ T C AT
UNIT ED
DISTR
S
Elizabeth D. Laporte Magistrate Judge of the District Court ED
T
RT U O
ER
N
3 Stipulation Re:CMC and [Proposed] Order
F D IS T IC T O R
A
C
LI
3:08-cv-02675-EDL
FO
La beth D. ge Eliza Jud
porte
R NIA
RDER IS SO O FIED IT DI AS MO
NO
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?